Recipient

Church Inn, Cheadle Hulme

First report 12 Jun 2017•Latest report 12 Jun 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Church Inn, Cheadle Hulme linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    William Joseph WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Joseph WILSON choked on a piece of steak, suffered hypoxic brain damage and remained in a coma before receiving end-of-life care and dying in hospital on 2 February 2017. Concerns included that the designated first aider was not called, there was no clear system for alerting the first aider, and staff attending Mr Wilson were unfamiliar with all life-saving first-aid techniques.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Church Inn, Cheadle Hulme; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system for alerting the first aider to problems

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) I was informed in evidence by the manager of the Church Inn that the designated first aider was the Chef who was not called to the scene. (2)The Manager of the Church Inn was unable to inform me of the system for alerting the first aider to any problem to ensure he attended the scene. (3)The manager and his colleague who attended upon the deceased were unfamiliar with all of the first aid life saving techniques when dealing with Mr Wilson. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Church Inn, Cheadle Hulme; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to call the designated first aider to the scene

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) I was informed in evidence by the manager of the Church Inn that the designated first aider was the Chef who was not called to the scene. (2)The Manager of the Church Inn was unable to inform me of the system for alerting the first aider to any problem to ensure he attended the scene. (3)The manager and his colleague who attended upon the deceased were unfamiliar with all of the first aid life saving techniques when dealing with Mr Wilson. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Church Inn, Cheadle Hulme; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of familiarity with first-aid life-saving techniques

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) I was informed in evidence by the manager of the Church Inn that the designated first aider was the Chef who was not called to the scene. (2)The Manager of the Church Inn was unable to inform me of the system for alerting the first aider to any problem to ensure he attended the scene. (3)The manager and his colleague who attended upon the deceased were unfamiliar with all of the first aid life saving techniques when dealing with Mr Wilson. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026