Recipient

Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital

First report 17 Dec 2013•Latest report 17 Dec 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Sub-organisation. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cardiff & the Vale of Glamorgan

    AI-generated summary

    John Elvet Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Elvet Morgan, who had Alzheimer’s dementia, was admitted for respite care and collapsed on 30 August 2013. Staff did not resuscitate him because they relied on an erroneous red DNR star left on the ward whiteboard, although no DNR agreement or form existed; the post-mortem report showed pulmonary embolism. The concerns identified included reliance on whiteboard information instead of patient notes, human error in recording information, and the possible use of similar DNR systems elsewhere in Wales.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure accurate information on whiteboards

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Whiteboard (or PSAG) is in use throughout Wales as a quick reference guide to the patients on the ward. It was introduced as part of the “Transforming Care at the bedside “TCAB” programme. Dr ███████ Clinical Director for the University Hospital for Wales Board, confirmed that the information which is put on the whiteboard is a matter for local discretion. While the red “DNR” star system has been removed from the whiteboards in use in Cardiff and the Vale Local Health Board he could not say whether similar systems are not in use elsewhere in Wales. (2) The whiteboard system is a useful reference point for patient care but there is a danger that the information held on the whiteboard is relied upon instead of the patient’s notes. (3) Human error may mean that erroneous information is held on the whiteboard to the detriment of patient care. (4) A similar DNR “red star” system may be in use on whiteboards in other Health Board areas in Wales with the possibility that a similar chain of events may occur elsewhere in Wales. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Potential continued use of DNR red star systems on whiteboards in Welsh Health Board areas

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Whiteboard (or PSAG) is in use throughout Wales as a quick reference guide to the patients on the ward. It was introduced as part of the “Transforming Care at the bedside “TCAB” programme. Dr ███████ Clinical Director for the University Hospital for Wales Board, confirmed that the information which is put on the whiteboard is a matter for local discretion. While the red “DNR” star system has been removed from the whiteboards in use in Cardiff and the Vale Local Health Board he could not say whether similar systems are not in use elsewhere in Wales. (2) The whiteboard system is a useful reference point for patient care but there is a danger that the information held on the whiteboard is relied upon instead of the patient’s notes. (3) Human error may mean that erroneous information is held on the whiteboard to the detriment of patient care. (4) A similar DNR “red star” system may be in use on whiteboards in other Health Board areas in Wales with the possibility that a similar chain of events may occur elsewhere in Wales. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of standardisation in information put on whiteboards

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Whiteboard (or PSAG) is in use throughout Wales as a quick reference guide to the patients on the ward. It was introduced as part of the “Transforming Care at the bedside “TCAB” programme. Dr ███████ Clinical Director for the University Hospital for Wales Board, confirmed that the information which is put on the whiteboard is a matter for local discretion. While the red “DNR” star system has been removed from the whiteboards in use in Cardiff and the Vale Local Health Board he could not say whether similar systems are not in use elsewhere in Wales. (2) The whiteboard system is a useful reference point for patient care but there is a danger that the information held on the whiteboard is relied upon instead of the patient’s notes. (3) Human error may mean that erroneous information is held on the whiteboard to the detriment of patient care. (4) A similar DNR “red star” system may be in use on whiteboards in other Health Board areas in Wales with the possibility that a similar chain of events may occur elsewhere in Wales. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Community Mental Health Services for Older People, Llandough Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reliance on whiteboard information instead of patients’ notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Whiteboard (or PSAG) is in use throughout Wales as a quick reference guide to the patients on the ward. It was introduced as part of the “Transforming Care at the bedside “TCAB” programme. Dr ███████ Clinical Director for the University Hospital for Wales Board, confirmed that the information which is put on the whiteboard is a matter for local discretion. While the red “DNR” star system has been removed from the whiteboards in use in Cardiff and the Vale Local Health Board he could not say whether similar systems are not in use elsewhere in Wales. (2) The whiteboard system is a useful reference point for patient care but there is a danger that the information held on the whiteboard is relied upon instead of the patient’s notes. (3) Human error may mean that erroneous information is held on the whiteboard to the detriment of patient care. (4) A similar DNR “red star” system may be in use on whiteboards in other Health Board areas in Wales with the possibility that a similar chain of events may occur elsewhere in Wales. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026