Recipient

Construction Industry Council

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Jul 2018•Latest report 27 Jul 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Professional membership body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
4stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Construction Industry Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Glynn Matthew Storey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Glynn Matthew Storey, aged 32, died after falling from a second-floor window while under the influence of alcohol, sustaining fatal injuries. The window was low and lacked a safety guard or opening restrictor, and none of the 40 flats in the development had such safety devices; there was also confusion about whether responsibility for meeting building standards lay with the building control inspector or the builder/owner.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Construction Industry Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about responsibility for ensuring that windows meet building standards

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There is confusion as to whether the approved building control inspector or the builder is responsible for ensuring that such windows meet building standards. Detailed enquiries by the police have shown that responsibility lies with the builder/owner. However, the owner/builder felt that as the building had been inspected on multiple occasions, all safety standards had been met. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
25%50%25%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026