Recipient

Dairy Lane Care Centre

Pin Request correction

First report 14 Feb 2018•Latest report 14 Feb 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Residential care home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Dairy Lane Care Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Mr John Thomas Lambton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tom was admitted to Sunderland Royal Hospital after a series of unwitnessed falls or incidents while in respite care, and was found to have a fractured neck of femur and an active subdural haemorrhage. He underwent surgery and monitoring but deteriorated 18 days after admission following a suspected subdural re-bleed and died on 27 August 2017. The concerns were that care home staff made assumptions about his health, disregarded his request for an ambulance, and communicated insufficiently with the GP.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Dairy Lane Care Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home staff to respond appropriately to requests for an ambulance following falls

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Care home staff disregarded Tom’s request for an ambulance following the fall ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Dairy Lane Care Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home staff to appropriately assess health following falls/incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Care home staff with no formal medical training made assumptions about Tom’s health following a series of falls/incidents ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Dairy Lane Care Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient communication with the GP about recent events

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was insufficient communication with the GP about recent events concerning Tom ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026