Recipient

DHL Supply Chain Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 24 Feb 2021•Latest report 24 Feb 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from DHL Supply Chain Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    David Edwin BLINMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 28 December 2018, David Edwin BLINMAN was walking home when he was struck by, or fell into the path of, a reversing articulated lorry and was crushed by its rear wheels. His death was declared at the scene. Concerns included inadequate risk assessments and mitigating measures for pedestrians in vehicle blind spots, the inability to conduct 360-degree checks while reversing without additional measures, and insufficient regard to Rule 202 of The Highway Code.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to DHL Supply Chain Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to incorporate current applicable driving guidelines into DPRA risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Risk Assessors should have regard to current applicable driving guidelines, such as here, Rule 202 of The Highway Code when assessing risk and completing the DPRA ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to DHL Supply Chain Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate DPRA control measures for vehicle collisions with pedestrians in vehicle blind spots

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The mitigating/control measures set out in the 2015, 2017 and 2019 DPRA’s do not adequately address the risks of vehicles colliding with pedestrians, in circumstances where the latter are located within vehicle blind spots. The measures, I understood from the evidence of the 2017 and 2019 Assessor, remain unchanged, and I believe, may well extend to all such DPRA’s, and not limited to the Blandy Terrace delivery location. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to DHL Supply Chain Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require consultation with store operators and regular delivery drivers about hazards and concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) DPRA’s do not mandate discussion with and documenting of, by the Risk Assessor, the views and experiences of the store owner/operator, nor of the drivers regularly delivering to the store, in relation to any particular hazards, or concerns. The Risk Assessor may not, therefore, be sufficiently informed of material which might assist him, or her in completing an adequate risk assessment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to DHL Supply Chain Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability of drivers to undertake 360-degree checks during reversing manoeuvres

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) 360 degree checks cannot be undertaken by a driver, whilst in the process of conducting a reversing manoeuvre, unless mitigating measures such as reversing cameras or a banksman are deployed ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to DHL Supply Chain Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document store operator and regular delivery driver views and experiences in DPRA risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) DPRA’s do not mandate discussion with and documenting of, by the Risk Assessor, the views and experiences of the store owner/operator, nor of the drivers regularly delivering to the store, in relation to any particular hazards, or concerns. The Risk Assessor may not, therefore, be sufficiently informed of material which might assist him, or her in completing an adequate risk assessment. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026