Recipient

Esteem Care Manchester LimitedIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Oct 2020•Latest report 12 Oct 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Esteem Care Manchester Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: ████████ Chief Executive Officer, Able Care & Support Services Ltd.

    Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Marion Glover · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marion Glover suffered an unwitnessed fall at Melbourne Court on 24 February 2020, sustaining facial and rib fractures, and later died in hospital on 15 April 2020. The report identified a serious risk that residents with cognitive illnesses or confusion could leave the building unknowingly where there were no restrictions on leaving and no observation of the foyer, and questioned whether the accommodation was suitable for such residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Esteem Care Manchester Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to restrict resident departures or observe foyer areas

    Wider context from the report

    “On exploration of this issue, it became apparent that in the absence of any restriction on residents leaving the building or observation of the foyer area there is a serious risk that such residents suffering cognitive illnesses/confusion can unknowingly leave the building. In the circumstances Melbourne Court does not appear to be suitable accommodation for residents who are suffering cognitive illnesses and confusion. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Esteem Care Manchester Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsuitable accommodation for residents suffering cognitive illnesses and confusion

    Wider context from the report

    “On exploration of this issue, it became apparent that in the absence of any restriction on residents leaving the building or observation of the foyer area there is a serious risk that such residents suffering cognitive illnesses/confusion can unknowingly leave the building. In the circumstances Melbourne Court does not appear to be suitable accommodation for residents who are suffering cognitive illnesses and confusion. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026