Recipient

Flintshire County Council

Pin Request correction

First report 17 May 2017•Latest report 10 Jul 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Welsh county council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
5

Naming this recipient

Published responses
20%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
40

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

20%published responses found
40stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Flintshire County Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Elizabeth Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Elizabeth Jones had an unwitnessed fall at home on 4 December 2022, followed by a 26-hour ambulance delay and a further 8-hour-23-minute wait on the ambulance outside the Emergency Department. She later deteriorated, an abdominal bleed was diagnosed, and she died on 14 January 2023. The principal concerns were the lengthy ambulance and patient offload delays, and the lack of meaningful evidence about Local Authority involvement in addressing patient-flow problems linked to social care deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance response and arrival

    Wider context from the report

    “This is a further Report, of several by me, as both Senior Coroner for North West Wales and Assistant Coroner for North Wales East & Central relating to matters of ambulance delays and inability to offload patients in a timely manner into Emergency Departments across North Wales. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that the initial delays experienced by Mary Elizabeth Jones whilst awaiting an ambulance and waiting in the rear of the ambulance possibly contributed indirectly to her existing frailty. Whilst not in themselves causative of Mrs Jones’ death it remains a significant concern that despite evidence of improvements by the Health Board and WAST upon which I have previously been provided, that even as recently as December 2022, unacceptably lengthy delays remain such as in the case of Mary Elizabeth Jones. I have still not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve Local Authorities in considerations of patient flow affected by social care deficiencies

    Wider context from the report

    “This is a further Report, of several by me, as both Senior Coroner for North West Wales and Assistant Coroner for North Wales East & Central relating to matters of ambulance delays and inability to offload patients in a timely manner into Emergency Departments across North Wales. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that the initial delays experienced by Mary Elizabeth Jones whilst awaiting an ambulance and waiting in the rear of the ambulance possibly contributed indirectly to her existing frailty. Whilst not in themselves causative of Mrs Jones’ death it remains a significant concern that despite evidence of improvements by the Health Board and WAST upon which I have previously been provided, that even as recently as December 2022, unacceptably lengthy delays remain such as in the case of Mary Elizabeth Jones. I have still not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability to offload patients from ambulances into Emergency Departments in a timely manner

    Wider context from the report

    “This is a further Report, of several by me, as both Senior Coroner for North West Wales and Assistant Coroner for North Wales East & Central relating to matters of ambulance delays and inability to offload patients in a timely manner into Emergency Departments across North Wales. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that the initial delays experienced by Mary Elizabeth Jones whilst awaiting an ambulance and waiting in the rear of the ambulance possibly contributed indirectly to her existing frailty. Whilst not in themselves causative of Mrs Jones’ death it remains a significant concern that despite evidence of improvements by the Health Board and WAST upon which I have previously been provided, that even as recently as December 2022, unacceptably lengthy delays remain such as in the case of Mary Elizabeth Jones. I have still not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. ”
    Open source report

  2. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Emlyn Victor Roberts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emlyn Victor Roberts called an ambulance on 13 March 2022 after sudden pain and difficulty breathing, but ambulance attendance was delayed by almost eleven and a half hours; he was found deceased at home on 14 March 2022. The principal concern was the significant and unacceptable delay in ambulance attendance, alongside concerns about continuing delays and inadequate cohesive planning for short-term pressures and longer-term solutions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst there was no direct evidence at the inquest to establish whether or not the outcome may have been different if Mr Roberts had received earlier medical care and attention, the delay in the attendance of the ambulance is significant and unacceptable. It is recognised that the reasons for such delay are multifactorial and both I and my Assistant Coroners have issued multiple previous reports for the prevention of future deaths expressing similar concerns. One of my earliest such reports expressing concern regarding ambulance response times, was in relation to a death in March 2013 and yet more than ten years later this problem has become significantly worse rather than better. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medically fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I remain significantly concerned not only that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future, but also that there is inadequate cohesive forward thinking or planning either in relation short term pressures (eg. winter pressures) or with a view to finding longer term solutions. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate cohesive forward planning for short-term pressures and longer-term solutions

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst there was no direct evidence at the inquest to establish whether or not the outcome may have been different if Mr Roberts had received earlier medical care and attention, the delay in the attendance of the ambulance is significant and unacceptable. It is recognised that the reasons for such delay are multifactorial and both I and my Assistant Coroners have issued multiple previous reports for the prevention of future deaths expressing similar concerns. One of my earliest such reports expressing concern regarding ambulance response times, was in relation to a death in March 2013 and yet more than ten years later this problem has become significantly worse rather than better. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medically fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I remain significantly concerned not only that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future, but also that there is inadequate cohesive forward thinking or planning either in relation short term pressures (eg. winter pressures) or with a view to finding longer term solutions. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of adequate social care placements or community care for patients medically fit for hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst there was no direct evidence at the inquest to establish whether or not the outcome may have been different if Mr Roberts had received earlier medical care and attention, the delay in the attendance of the ambulance is significant and unacceptable. It is recognised that the reasons for such delay are multifactorial and both I and my Assistant Coroners have issued multiple previous reports for the prevention of future deaths expressing similar concerns. One of my earliest such reports expressing concern regarding ambulance response times, was in relation to a death in March 2013 and yet more than ten years later this problem has become significantly worse rather than better. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medically fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I remain significantly concerned not only that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future, but also that there is inadequate cohesive forward thinking or planning either in relation short term pressures (eg. winter pressures) or with a view to finding longer term solutions. ”
    Open source report

  3. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Jean Frickel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jean Frickel became unresponsive and died at home on 20 December 2022 after an ambulance call the previous evening and a further call the following morning. Paramedics arrived 13 hours and 3 minutes after the initial call. The report states that the delay denied her the opportunity for possible life-extending treatment and raises continuing concerns about ambulance delays, hospital patient flow, social care deficiencies, and coordination between health services and local authorities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance handover at hospitals

    Wider context from the report

    “There was evidence from WAST and BCUHB that improvements had been made internally within their organisations. It seems that patient flow i.e. those patients who are ready to be discharged from hospital but are unable to be discharged due to insufficiencies in social care means that ambulances are unable to offload patients into the Emergency Department which then causes the community delays as ambulances are not readily available. I have not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients (as well as handover at hospitals). I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. Specifically, I require responses to the following:- 1. Extent of working relationship between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities to address the above issues; and 2. Extent of progress between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities in addressing the above issues; and 3. Extent of Strategic plan of action / improvement plan to address the above issues. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain timely ambulance availability and arrival for patients

    Wider context from the report

    “There was evidence from WAST and BCUHB that improvements had been made internally within their organisations. It seems that patient flow i.e. those patients who are ready to be discharged from hospital but are unable to be discharged due to insufficiencies in social care means that ambulances are unable to offload patients into the Emergency Department which then causes the community delays as ambulances are not readily available. I have not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients (as well as handover at hospitals). I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. Specifically, I require responses to the following:- 1. Extent of working relationship between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities to address the above issues; and 2. Extent of progress between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities in addressing the above issues; and 3. Extent of Strategic plan of action / improvement plan to address the above issues. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient social care capacity causing hospital patient-flow and ambulance offload delays

    Wider context from the report

    “There was evidence from WAST and BCUHB that improvements had been made internally within their organisations. It seems that patient flow i.e. those patients who are ready to be discharged from hospital but are unable to be discharged due to insufficiencies in social care means that ambulances are unable to offload patients into the Emergency Department which then causes the community delays as ambulances are not readily available. I have not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients (as well as handover at hospitals). I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. Specifically, I require responses to the following:- 1. Extent of working relationship between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities to address the above issues; and 2. Extent of progress between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities in addressing the above issues; and 3. Extent of Strategic plan of action / improvement plan to address the above issues. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of meaningful Local Authority involvement in addressing social-care-related patient-flow deficiencies

    Wider context from the report

    “There was evidence from WAST and BCUHB that improvements had been made internally within their organisations. It seems that patient flow i.e. those patients who are ready to be discharged from hospital but are unable to be discharged due to insufficiencies in social care means that ambulances are unable to offload patients into the Emergency Department which then causes the community delays as ambulances are not readily available. I have not been presented with any meaningful evidence on the involvement of Local Authorities in the considerations by WAST and BCUHB of lack of patient flow due to social care deficiencies. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients (as well as handover at hospitals). I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. Specifically, I require responses to the following:- 1. Extent of working relationship between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities to address the above issues; and 2. Extent of progress between WAST, BCU and North Wales Local Authorities in addressing the above issues; and 3. Extent of Strategic plan of action / improvement plan to address the above issues. ”
    Open source report

  4. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Leonard Charles Harmsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leonard Charles Harmsworth died on 18 June 2022 after a fall caused a fractured ankle and immobility, followed by a sudden deterioration after ankle manipulation. The report raised significant concerns about delays in ambulance arrival and hospital handover, although it stated that these delays did not cause or contribute to his death. It expressed concern that such delays were continuing and that deaths could occur in the future.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulances arriving to patients

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the fall at home on 7ᵗʰ June 2022 WAST were contacted at 05:23. An ambulance arrived 17 hours 22 minutes later. On arrival at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Leonard Harmsworth was handed in the ambulance for 12 hours 4 minutes before being handed over to nursing staff. Whilst the time it took for the ambulance to arrive to Mr Harmsworth’s home and the time it took for Mr Harmsworth to be handed over to nursing staff at hospital did not cause or contribute to Mr Harmsworth’s death, the delays experienced are significant. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medical fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients and handover at hospitals. I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance handover at hospitals

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the fall at home on 7ᵗʰ June 2022 WAST were contacted at 05:23. An ambulance arrived 17 hours 22 minutes later. On arrival at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Leonard Harmsworth was handed in the ambulance for 12 hours 4 minutes before being handed over to nursing staff. Whilst the time it took for the ambulance to arrive to Mr Harmsworth’s home and the time it took for Mr Harmsworth to be handed over to nursing staff at hospital did not cause or contribute to Mr Harmsworth’s death, the delays experienced are significant. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medical fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients and handover at hospitals. I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate social care placements or community care for patients medically fit for discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the fall at home on 7ᵗʰ June 2022 WAST were contacted at 05:23. An ambulance arrived 17 hours 22 minutes later. On arrival at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd Leonard Harmsworth was handed in the ambulance for 12 hours 4 minutes before being handed over to nursing staff. Whilst the time it took for the ambulance to arrive to Mr Harmsworth’s home and the time it took for Mr Harmsworth to be handed over to nursing staff at hospital did not cause or contribute to Mr Harmsworth’s death, the delays experienced are significant. It is understood that the matter of ambulance delays is not solely a matter for WAST hence this report being sent to those organisations involved in its impact across the Health Board area (to include the provision of social care where patients are medical fit for discharge from hospitals but without adequate placements / care in the community). I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to BCUHB and WAST pertaining to the length of time it is taking for ambulances to arrive to patients and handover at hospitals. I remain significantly concerned that delays are continuing and that deaths will continue to occur into the future. ”
    Open source report

  5. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Lilly Baxandall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lilly Baxandall was found collapsed at home after an unwitnessed fall and was taken to hospital by ambulance. Her ambulance handover was delayed for almost four hours amid capacity issues, and a CT scan later showed a large acute subdural haematoma that could not be treated; she died on 5 September 2014. The report raised concerns about continuing ambulance and handover delays, bed shortages, patient flow and delayed transfers of care, placing patients’ lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in emergency department patient handover

    Wider context from the report

    “Following an inquest which concluded in January 2014 I issued a regulation 28 report in which I expressed concerns regarding the handover of patients at an emergency department which resulted in "unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls". In September 2014 I issued a further regulation 28 report raising similar concerns regarding delays. In November 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report concerning delays in an emergency department which "were excessive and inadequate action was taken by the Health Board to overcome the problems of staff shortages leading to long waiting times and risks to patients". In December 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concerns regarding the throughput of patients in hospital and Delayed Transfer of Care. In August 2016 I issued a regulation 28 report regarding a delay in admission to hospital via the emergency department which formed part of a cumulative delay in diagnosis and treatment which prevented a patient having the best prospect of a successful outcome. In January 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing a concern “that there are invariably delays in admissions to hospital as there are insufficient beds available to accommodate all admissions”. In March 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concern that there “continue to be substantial delays in the handover of patients particularly as a result of problems in patient flow resulting in an inability to admit patients who require treatment” Despite the above reports issued to the Health Board and Ambulance Service the problems of ambulance delays/handover delays/bed blocking/patient flow and delayed transfer of care continue to the present day and patients’ lives are being placed at risk as a result. It is very well recognised that the issues are multifactorial and will require multi agency cooperation for improvements or change to be made, however unless services and resources are made available or working practices altered to facilitate such change then it is inevitable that future deaths will occur which might have otherwise been preventable. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain adequate emergency department staffing

    Wider context from the report

    “Following an inquest which concluded in January 2014 I issued a regulation 28 report in which I expressed concerns regarding the handover of patients at an emergency department which resulted in "unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls". In September 2014 I issued a further regulation 28 report raising similar concerns regarding delays. In November 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report concerning delays in an emergency department which "were excessive and inadequate action was taken by the Health Board to overcome the problems of staff shortages leading to long waiting times and risks to patients". In December 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concerns regarding the throughput of patients in hospital and Delayed Transfer of Care. In August 2016 I issued a regulation 28 report regarding a delay in admission to hospital via the emergency department which formed part of a cumulative delay in diagnosis and treatment which prevented a patient having the best prospect of a successful outcome. In January 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing a concern “that there are invariably delays in admissions to hospital as there are insufficient beds available to accommodate all admissions”. In March 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concern that there “continue to be substantial delays in the handover of patients particularly as a result of problems in patient flow resulting in an inability to admit patients who require treatment” Despite the above reports issued to the Health Board and Ambulance Service the problems of ambulance delays/handover delays/bed blocking/patient flow and delayed transfer of care continue to the present day and patients’ lives are being placed at risk as a result. It is very well recognised that the issues are multifactorial and will require multi agency cooperation for improvements or change to be made, however unless services and resources are made available or working practices altered to facilitate such change then it is inevitable that future deaths will occur which might have otherwise been preventable. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient hospital bed capacity for admissions

    Wider context from the report

    “Following an inquest which concluded in January 2014 I issued a regulation 28 report in which I expressed concerns regarding the handover of patients at an emergency department which resulted in "unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls". In September 2014 I issued a further regulation 28 report raising similar concerns regarding delays. In November 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report concerning delays in an emergency department which "were excessive and inadequate action was taken by the Health Board to overcome the problems of staff shortages leading to long waiting times and risks to patients". In December 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concerns regarding the throughput of patients in hospital and Delayed Transfer of Care. In August 2016 I issued a regulation 28 report regarding a delay in admission to hospital via the emergency department which formed part of a cumulative delay in diagnosis and treatment which prevented a patient having the best prospect of a successful outcome. In January 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing a concern “that there are invariably delays in admissions to hospital as there are insufficient beds available to accommodate all admissions”. In March 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concern that there “continue to be substantial delays in the handover of patients particularly as a result of problems in patient flow resulting in an inability to admit patients who require treatment” Despite the above reports issued to the Health Board and Ambulance Service the problems of ambulance delays/handover delays/bed blocking/patient flow and delayed transfer of care continue to the present day and patients’ lives are being placed at risk as a result. It is very well recognised that the issues are multifactorial and will require multi agency cooperation for improvements or change to be made, however unless services and resources are made available or working practices altered to facilitate such change then it is inevitable that future deaths will occur which might have otherwise been preventable. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Flintshire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of hospital patient flow and delayed transfer of care processes

    Wider context from the report

    “Following an inquest which concluded in January 2014 I issued a regulation 28 report in which I expressed concerns regarding the handover of patients at an emergency department which resulted in "unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls". In September 2014 I issued a further regulation 28 report raising similar concerns regarding delays. In November 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report concerning delays in an emergency department which "were excessive and inadequate action was taken by the Health Board to overcome the problems of staff shortages leading to long waiting times and risks to patients". In December 2015 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concerns regarding the throughput of patients in hospital and Delayed Transfer of Care. In August 2016 I issued a regulation 28 report regarding a delay in admission to hospital via the emergency department which formed part of a cumulative delay in diagnosis and treatment which prevented a patient having the best prospect of a successful outcome. In January 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing a concern “that there are invariably delays in admissions to hospital as there are insufficient beds available to accommodate all admissions”. In March 2017 I issued a regulation 28 report expressing concern that there “continue to be substantial delays in the handover of patients particularly as a result of problems in patient flow resulting in an inability to admit patients who require treatment” Despite the above reports issued to the Health Board and Ambulance Service the problems of ambulance delays/handover delays/bed blocking/patient flow and delayed transfer of care continue to the present day and patients’ lives are being placed at risk as a result. It is very well recognised that the issues are multifactorial and will require multi agency cooperation for improvements or change to be made, however unless services and resources are made available or working practices altered to facilitate such change then it is inevitable that future deaths will occur which might have otherwise been preventable. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

20%
20%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
45%45%10%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026