Recipient

FOLD

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Jan 2026•Latest report 27 Jan 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Venue. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
9stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from FOLD linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Haaris Amin BHATTI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Haaris Amin BHATTI took drugs before entering Fold Nightclub and took more drugs while inside. He became seriously unwell, but nightclub staff delayed calling an ambulance; the report states that this delay decreased his chance of survival and reflected the club’s training and culture.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to FOLD; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to call an ambulance promptly for a medical emergency

    Wider context from the report

    “At approximately 4.45am, Haaris was noted by nightclub staff to be unwell and was taken to the welfare room in a wheelchair. He was very hot, had an extremely fast heart rate and extremely high blood pressure, and appeared to the club first aider to be psychotic. He was monitored and he later explained that he had taken ████████. However, there was a failure by club staff to call an ambulance until 5.57am. Staff agreed with me at inquest that they should have called an ambulance as soon as they got Haaris into the welfare room and saw his condition. The delay in seeking definitive medical care decreased Harris’s chance of survival. The delay did not seem to me to be simply about any individual member of staff, but rather it reflected the club’s training and culture as a whole. Staff were concerned for Haaris, but this concern did not translate into effective management of his medical emergency. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require immediate ambulance calls when a guest’s vital signs and temperature are high, regardless of hallucinations or antidepressant history.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This prompted us to adapt our welfare protocols to immediately call an ambulance if the combination of a guests’ vitals and temperature are high, irrespective of the hallucinations presented or previous history with anti-depressants. This approach is intended to remove uncertainty and ensure that guests receive prompt access to professional medical care where necessary.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contract and deploy Frontline Medical Response medical staff and life-support equipment at all nighttime events to support welfare assessment and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have contracted the services of Frontline Medical Response LTD, to be present for all nighttime events moving forward. In addition to their medical staff being present on all events, with additional life-supporting equipment, their medical staff will work alongside our welfare team and assist with medical assessment and escalation where required.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and strengthen welfare escalation procedures for prompt emergency-service contact when guests present serious symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the concern identified during the inquest that emergency medical services should have been contacted earlier once Haaris was brought to the welfare area. Following the events of July 2025 we reviewed our escalation procedures to ensure that emergency medical services are contacted promptly where a guest presents with serious symptoms.”

    Source location

    Response from FOLD nightclub
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
78%11%11%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026