Recipient

G4S Care And Justice Services (UK) Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 31 Jul 2025•Latest report 31 Jul 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
400%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
10

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

400%published responses found
8stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from G4S Care And Justice Services (UK) Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Lewis Rhys Thomas Petryszyn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lewis Rhys Thomas Petryszyn died in his shared cell at HMP Parc on 15 April 2022 after inhaling synthetic cannabinoids without intending to end his life. The principal concern was the absence of specified timeframes for intervention, ongoing support and case-load allocation for prisoners at risk of substance misuse, creating a risk of delayed support and intervention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to G4S Care And Justice Services (UK) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of specified prescribed timeframes for intervention, ongoing support and case load allocation for prisoners at risk of substance misuse

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was, and remains, an absence of specified prescribed timeframes in policies and procedures within which intervention, ongoing support, and/or case load allocation to/from Dyfodol must occur for prisoners likely to be at risk of substance misuse. (2) The absence of prescribed timeframes poses the real risk of delayed support and intervention to drug users ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

400%
400%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
50%25%25%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026