Recipient

General Chiropractic Council

First report 26 Nov 2019•Latest report 22 Jan 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Health and care professional regulator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
6stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from General Chiropractic Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Joanna Kowalczyk · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joanna Kowalczyk developed neurological symptoms after chiropractic neck manipulation following an earlier neck injury and hospital attendance, and was later diagnosed with vertebral artery dissection and extensive posterior fossa infarction. She died at Queen Elizabeth Hospital on 19 October 2021. Concerns included a paramedic’s lack of awareness that stroke symptoms can resolve temporarily, and the chiropractor’s failure to obtain medical or hospital records before treatment despite the recent hospital attendance and recommended investigations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to General Chiropractic Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence on behalf of the treating chiropractor was that he did not consider it necessary to request GP records or hospital records, before assessment or treatment despite being informed about the Deceased’s recent hospital attendance, investigation which was recommended, and her discharge against medical advice. Even in the updated consent form I have been provided with, which was designed by the British Chiropractic Association, there is no prompt or question designed for the chiropractor to ask to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment, and when this may be appropriate, and the only reference to medical records is a consent to communicate as deemed necessary for the treatment, and for a report to be sent to the GP after treatment. I am concerned that consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment, particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations has been undertaken. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to General Chiropractic Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of paramedic training on transient stroke symptoms

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The evidence from the attending paramedic was that she was not aware that symptoms of a stroke can stop after a short time as clearly set out on NHS website and guidance, and that this was not part of her training. This was directly contrary to the Head of Operations’ evidence that this was part of both paramedic training and annual continuing professional development. This was a concerning feature given the accepted evidence of the time critical period to treat patients with symptoms potentially indicative of stroke. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to General Chiropractic Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of a consent-form prompt to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence on behalf of the treating chiropractor was that he did not consider it necessary to request GP records or hospital records, before assessment or treatment despite being informed about the Deceased’s recent hospital attendance, investigation which was recommended, and her discharge against medical advice. Even in the updated consent form I have been provided with, which was designed by the British Chiropractic Association, there is no prompt or question designed for the chiropractor to ask to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment, and when this may be appropriate, and the only reference to medical records is a consent to communicate as deemed necessary for the treatment, and for a report to be sent to the GP after treatment. I am concerned that consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment, particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations has been undertaken. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree an Expert Group Action Plan with chiropractic profession representatives to mitigate comparable incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This letter is to update you on the findings of the Expert Group, and the Action Plan that the GCC and representatives of the chiropractic profession have agreed to take to mitigate against a comparable incident occurring in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from General Chiropractic Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The new Code’s changes would not have materially altered the chiropractor’s expected conduct in this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2024, the GCC reviewed and updated the standards of proficiency for chiropractors. The new standards were published ahead of the inquest (31 December 2024) but must “sit” for a year before they come into effect (on the 1 January 2026). References to the Code of Professional Practice in this letter, and in the Action Plan, refer to this new document (which was not in place at the time of Joanna’s death). However, we do not believe that the changes to the Code would have made a material difference to the expectations of the chiropractor in this case.”

    Source location

    Response from General Chiropractic Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 January 2025

    Open published response
  2. North Yorkshire and City of York

    AI-generated summary

    John Thomas Lawler · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Thomas Lawler suffered a fractured neck and spinal cord damage during chiropractic spinal adjustment and subsequent mobilisation on 11 August 2017. He died from respiratory depression caused by the traumatic spinal cord injury on 12 August 2017. Concerns included the absence of pre-treatment spinal imaging and mobilisation after he reported loss of sensation in his arms.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to General Chiropractic Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to avoid mobilisation after loss of sensation in the arms

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mr Lawler was mobilised from the treatment table to a chair after loss of sensation in his arms. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to General Chiropractic Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of pre-treatment spinal imaging

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) No pre-treatment images were taken of Mr Lawler's spine. Ossification of the spine was not known until post-trauma CT images were obtained. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
67%17%17%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026