Other public bodies · Health and care professional regulator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.
Reports
3
Naming this recipient
Published responses
67%
Found for named reports
Concerns addressed
3
Across all linked responses
Stated actions
4
Described in responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports naming this recipient by issue year.
Evidence profile
Report topics
Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.
67%published responses found
4stated actions described
Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.
Concerns and recipient responses
Statements from General Dental Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
East London
Concerns raised5
Allergy plans failing to distinguish lip swelling as a potential anaphylaxis symptom
Insufficient education of parents and patients on safe AAI use when in doubt
Failure to recognise inability to swallow as a sign of anaphylaxis in dental settings
Lack of sufficiently clear distinction between anaphylactic and mild reactions
Unavailability of AAI stock in chemists for emergencies
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
Action
Review CPD requirements and consider proposing changes to medical-emergency recommendations.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 August 2024.
Action
Write to NICE requesting review of anaphylaxis symptoms and related guidance for dental professionals.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 August 2024.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.2
Position
Potential CPD changes requiring legislation may be delayed because the timing of legislative changes is outside the respondent’s control.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
Position
The current standards and guidance provide clear obligations, so additional or different standards are not currently considered necessary.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Central and South East Kent
Concerns raised1
Failure to limit publication of detailed undetermined allegations during interim proceedings
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
Action
Review the policy governing publication of Interim Order outcomes to balance open justice with registrants’ interests.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 November 2023.
Action
Review guidance and arrangements governing whether Interim Order hearings are held in public or private.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 November 2023.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.2
Position
Open-justice requirements, published interim-order reasons and discretion to hold hearings privately currently address transparency and registrant-protection concerns.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Position
Changes to the statutory Rules cannot be implemented solely by the regulator and may take longer because approval is outside its full control.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
Swansea and Neath Port Talbot
Concerns raised3
Potential for Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction causing increased blood clotting time and INR
Lack of knowledge of the Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction among health professionals
Unclear or difficult-to-locate resources for checking the Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
Pin
Request correction
Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations