Recipient

George Eliot HospitalIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 18 May 2016•Latest report 1 Mar 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from George Eliot Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: Chief Executive – George Eliot Hospital.

    Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Anderton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The supplied text does not describe the circumstances of Mr Anderton’s death, but states that an inquest concluded with a Narrative Verdict. The principal concern was that medical staff failed to attempt CPR after consulting the wrong set of medical notes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to George Eliot Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consult the correct set of medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) the failure of the medical staff to attempt CPR having consulted the wrong set of medical notes ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to George Eliot Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to attempt CPR

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) the failure of the medical staff to attempt CPR having consulted the wrong set of medical notes ”
    Open source report

  2. Addressed to: Chief Executive – George Eliot Hospital.

    Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Stanley SAMPEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stanley Sampey, an in-patient at George Eliot Hospital, choked on a food bolus while eating in bed on 5 March 2016. Staff found that both the wall-mounted suction device and a portable suction unit were not working, and concerns included the lack of working suction equipment and inadequate checking procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to George Eliot Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of working suction equipment on wards

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was no working available suction equipment on the Ward to manage the patient’s airway at the time of the cardiac arrest. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to George Eliot Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an effective procedure for checking suction equipment on wards

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was a lack of any structured checking procedure in place to ensure working suction equipment on wards. 3. The battery on the portable suction unit was found to be flat and the checking procedure was incorrect. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026