Recipient

Green Lane House

Pin Request correction

First report 8 Jul 2015•Latest report 8 Jul 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Green Lane House linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Meryl Parry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Meryl Parry, who had Alzheimer’s disease and tended to wander, was discharged from a residential home on 1 September 2014 after leaving it unobserved and was returned home. She was subsequently unlawfully killed by her husband; concerns included the absence of a system requiring residential homes to seek Social Services advice before discharge and risks to residents’ safety and welfare afterwards.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Green Lane House; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate arrangements to ensure residents' safety and welfare after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There appears to be no system in place whereby the managers of a residential home are required to seek advice from Social Services before discharging a resident (2) There is therefore a serious risk that there are no appropriate arrangements in place to ensure the safety and welfare of the resident after discharge. (3) The system for seeking advice from Social Services should apply irrespective of whether Social Services had placed the resident at the home or whether the placement had been a private one. In the latter case it is likely that a social worker will have been aware of, or had some involvement in, the placement. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Green Lane House; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system requiring residential home managers to seek Social Services advice before discharging residents

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There appears to be no system in place whereby the managers of a residential home are required to seek advice from Social Services before discharging a resident (2) There is therefore a serious risk that there are no appropriate arrangements in place to ensure the safety and welfare of the resident after discharge. (3) The system for seeking advice from Social Services should apply irrespective of whether Social Services had placed the resident at the home or whether the placement had been a private one. In the latter case it is likely that a social worker will have been aware of, or had some involvement in, the placement. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026