Recipient

Guest Medical Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 31 Jan 2014•Latest report 31 Jan 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Guest Medical Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    William George KENT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William George KENT was admitted to hospital after a fall and later developed acute respiratory distress after Haz-Tab granules were used on urine near his bed. He was transferred for further treatment but died after chlorine inhalation was identified as a significant contributing trigger. Concerns included insufficient awareness and training about the hazards and appropriate use of Haz-Tab granules, including the release of noxious gases when they contact urine.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Guest Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity on the use of Haz-Tab granules in clinical spillages

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Lack of clarity on how Haz-Tab granules should be used in clinical spillages ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Guest Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of awareness of Haz-Tab granules’ potentially harmful side-effects for urine spillages

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Lack of awareness of the potentially harmful side-effects of Haz-Tab granules for urine spillages ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Guest Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Under-emphasis of hazardous consequences from noxious gas release when Haz-Tab granules contact urine

    Wider context from the report

    “4. An under-emphasis of the potential hazardous consequences from the release of noxious gases when Haz-Tab granules are in contact with urine (with or without contamination of blood) ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Guest Medical Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited teaching of cleaning products’ side-effects during staff induction and mandatory infection control updates

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Limited time given over to the teaching of the side-effects of cleaning products such as Haz-Tab granules at the induction of new staff and at yearly mandatory infection control updates ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026