Recipient

Harden & Bingley Park Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Sep 2021•Latest report 29 Sep 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
1stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Harden & Bingley Park Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Mohammad Abu FARHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mohammad Abu Farhan drowned while swimming in the water below Goit Stock Waterfall, Hallas Lane, Cullingworth, Bradford, on 30 March 2021. At the inquest, concern was raised that signs prohibiting swimming were obscured by vegetation and appeared old, making the dangers less explicit and noticeable.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Harden & Bingley Park Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain prominent and sufficiently explicit signs prohibiting swimming beneath the waterfall

    Wider context from the report

    “At the inquest I noted from exhibited photographs that the signs prohibiting swimming in the waters under the water fall are obscured by vegetation and appear to be of some age such that I would ask you to consider reviewing the signs in order to make the dangers of swimming more explicit and noticeable. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Erect additional warning signs around Goit Stock waterfall.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are not this type of park. The woods, beck and waterfall are privately owned with public footpaths. There are no facilities. Our residents our mainly elderly and vulnerable people and they have felt threatened by all the anti-social behaviour. Our local Councillors, police and Community Officers are aware of the situation but, like ourselves, feel completely overwhelmed by the situation. We are powerless to do anything and the police’s resources are too often overstretched to deal with all the anti-social behaviour. However, we will comply with the Coroner’s recommendations and erect some more signs around the area of Goit Stock waterfall. We will forward photos of the proposed signs and where we intend to put them (see attachments). Please look at our proposals and let us know if they are acceptable. We can then get the signs made and erected in the appropriate places.”

    Source location

    2021-0323-Response-from-Harden-Bingley-Park-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Signage at Goit Stock waterfall was not obscured by vegetation and was clearly visible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dear Sirs, We are the owners and directors of Harden & Bingley Park Limited. Goit Stock waterfall where the tragic incident occurred, is on our land. We and our residents were devastated to hear of the death of Mohammed Abu Farhan and once again our condolences go out to his family and friends. We would like to place on record our upset at the way we have been criticised by the report and the media and in particular the BBC. We were not approached by the Coroner prior to the report being published and we do not even know whether there was actually a site visit. If there was a site visit, by them why were we not involved? We dispute certain issues raised in the report. For example, we dispute the fact that signage was obscured by vegetation. This can be proven by the BBC TV report on 31st March when the camera actually zoomed in on the signs and they were clearly visible.”

    Source location

    2021-0323-Response-from-Harden-Bingley-Park-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relevant authorities must consider additional measures to prevent accidents because warning signs are vulnerable to vandalism.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We must reiterate that the signs will be vulnerable to vandalism and consequently the relevant authorities need to consider other actions to prevent any further tragic accidents. Regards,”

    Source location

    2021-0323-Response-from-Harden-Bingley-Park-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026