Recipient

Hilltop Court Nursing Home

Pin Request correction

First report 3 Apr 2018•Latest report 3 Apr 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Hilltop Court Nursing Home linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Barbara Haley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barbara Haley inhaled vomit, saliva, food or liquid while resident at Hilltop Court Care Home, developed a chest infection, and died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 13 October 2017 after suffering a cardiac arrest en route. Concerns included her being provided food unsuitable for her soft diet and being left alone to eat despite having been assessed as at high risk of choking.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hilltop Court Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provision of food unsuitable for a soft diet

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mrs Haley was on a soft diet (described as a “fork-mashable diet” in evidence). Despite this, there was evidence that Mrs Haley had been provided with food items not suitable for her by staff. In particular, on one occasion toast was found in her room. On another occasion, staff had apparently suggested to a family member that chocolate could be given to Mrs Haley. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hilltop Court Nursing Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to supervise high-risk residents while eating

    Wider context from the report

    “2. During the course of her evidence, ████████ (Home Manager) explained that Mrs Haley was assessed as being at High Risk of choking and scored high on the risk assessment that had been carried out. Despite this, Mrs Haley would be left alone in her room to eat because ████████ stated she did not like to have staff present when she was eating; she would then refuse to eat. We heard evidence from a manager at another home that Mrs Haley would eat when she was in the dining room with other residents, where staff could also observe her. It was of concern that Mrs Haley was being left alone in her room to eat when she had been assessed as being at the high risk of choking. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026