Recipient

Humber Bridge Board

Pin Request correction

First report 19 Mar 2018•Latest report 10 Nov 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Public transport authority. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
7stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Humber Bridge Board linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Elizabeth Anne WATSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elizabeth Anne Watson attended the Humber Bridge on 5 December 2022 and jumped from it, landing on Cliff Road; she was declared dead at the scene. The concerns included a lack of structured training, including input from trained mental-health professionals, for bridge security staff identifying and responding to people in mental-health distress, as well as delays in emergency and mental-health support responses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Humber Bridge Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in emergency and mental health support responses

    Wider context from the report

    “While the “Right Care/Right Person” process appears to ensure that the correct emergency service should respond if called, delays in response means often staff are left dealing with a vulnerable person for many hours due to unavailability of emergency services or mental health support. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Humber Bridge Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of structured, clinically informed training for staff identifying and interacting with people in mental health crisis

    Wider context from the report

    “It appeared there was no structured training policy in place to ensure that staff are given appropriate training to deal with identifying vulnerable people. On joining, staff have an 8 weeks mentoring course, whereby an experienced colleague shows them the role and advises on what to look for. Staff may also undertake an on line suicide prevention course and mental health first aid at work as well as safety harness/working at height training. However there appeared to be no structure to any of the training for this vital role and of more concern there was no input from a trained medical professional with significant knowledge of working with those suffering from mental health crisis. Nor was there any current input with regard to how to talk and negotiate with people in crisis. I was informed that there were many very competent staff who had good intuition, but I have concerns that without appropriate and structured input from a health care professional, any experience on the job is based on unstable foundations. It was evident that the role is vitally important in identifying those at risk and seeking the appropriate help. Without receiving knowledge from someone trained in mental health, having a substantive input on negotiation and how to interact with those in crisis then the difficult job of assessing people and reacting appropriately with them becomes very difficult. ”
    Open source report

  2. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Kellie Marie TAYLOR formerly known as Kellie Marie DANVILLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kellie Marie TAYLOR, formerly known as Kellie Marie DANVILLE, died after jumping from the Humber Bridge into the river below. The concern was that the existing CCTV system did not provide images of sufficient quality to enable those monitoring it to accurately see behaviour or activities at the bridge, potentially delaying intervention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Humber Bridge Board; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of CCTV image quality to support accurate monitoring of bridge activity

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that if other individuals go to the bridge with the intention of jumping off or any other emergency were to occur, the quality of the TV system as it is now is such that their behaviour or activities cannot be accurately seen by those monitoring the system and as a consequence, intervention may not be provided in a timely fashion. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026