Recipient

Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 21 Jun 2016•Latest report 21 Jun 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Olive Wilmott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Olive Wilmott was found on the floor of a communal area of a residential care home after suffering a hip fracture. The Inquest concluded that she died from the effects of a urine infection and severe dementia, with the hip fracture a contributory factor. Concerns included possible pushing that was not effectively investigated or referred for safeguarding, and a lack of evidence that required 15-minute observations were provided amid insufficient night-shift staffing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make Safeguarding referrals for suspected abuse or neglect

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That there were references in the medical records to Miss Wilmott possibly having been pushed, but no or no effective investigation of the circumstances was made at the time and no Safeguarding referral was made. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to effectively investigate suspected pushing incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That there were references in the medical records to Miss Wilmott possibly having been pushed, but no or no effective investigation of the circumstances was made at the time and no Safeguarding referral was made. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient overnight staffing for dementia unit residents’ needs

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That Miss Wilmott was assessed as requiring observation at 15 minute intervals, but there was no evidence that this had been in place and at the time of the event there were insufficient staff in place for her and other residents’ needs (one staff member dedicated per floor of the dementia unit during the night shift). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain required 15-minute observation of residents

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That Miss Wilmott was assessed as requiring observation at 15 minute intervals, but there was no evidence that this had been in place and at the time of the event there were insufficient staff in place for her and other residents’ needs (one staff member dedicated per floor of the dementia unit during the night shift). ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026