Recipient

Ilkeston Community Hospital

Pin Request correction

First report 18 Oct 2022•Latest report 18 Oct 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ilkeston Community Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth PERKINS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth Perkins, who had a history of recurrent falls and several co-morbidities, was admitted to Royal Derby Hospital after presenting with left-sided weakness, facial droop and confusion. While confused and lacking capacity, he wandered without assistance despite a risk assessment requiring one carer when mobilising, fell and hit his head, and later died on 11 September 2018 after subarachnoid bleeding could not be treated. The principal concern was the absence of a clear, detailed transfer handover covering his medication, medical history and recurrent falls, and the receiving hospital’s failure to request one, which may have prevented enhanced care and observation being put in place.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ilkeston Community Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear, detailed transfer documentation covering medication, medical history and recurrent falls

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Perkins was transferred from Ilkeston Community Hospital to the Royal Derby Hospital. There was no clear detailed handover or transfer document which would have detailed his medication, medical history and history of recurrent falls The Royal Derby Hospital did not (but should have) requested a transfer document. That history would have allowed an enhanced level of care and observation to be put in place so as to prevent further falls. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ilkeston Community Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to request a transfer document

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Perkins was transferred from Ilkeston Community Hospital to the Royal Derby Hospital. There was no clear detailed handover or transfer document which would have detailed his medication, medical history and history of recurrent falls The Royal Derby Hospital did not (but should have) requested a transfer document. That history would have allowed an enhanced level of care and observation to be put in place so as to prevent further falls. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026