12 Mar 2018 Leigh William Wilde · Prevention of Future Deaths report Manchester South
View report summary
Concerns raised 6 Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions View source Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings View source Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March View source Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them View source Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee View source Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services View source See 3 more concerns
No linked response statements No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
×
AI-generated summary
Leigh William Wilde · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Leigh William Wilde had raised concerns about issues at his workplace and was found suspended from a ligature at his home after being suspended from employment. Concerns included a lack of documentation and risk assessment relating to the suspension, no evidence of discussion of risk or referral to support services, and unclear approaches to whistleblowers and their support.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of documentation setting out the rationale for suspension decisions
Wider context from the report “• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to consider and discuss risk at meetings
Wider context from the report “• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to retain notes of the meeting on 13th March
Wider context from the report “• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of a clear approach to whistleblowers and support for them
Wider context from the report “• The approach of both LTE and IMI towards whistleblowers and support for them was unclear.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to consider risk factors and risk minimisation when deciding whether to suspend an employee
Wider context from the report “• Leigh William Wilde had been suspended from his employment shortly before his death. There was no supporting documentation to set out the rationale for the decision. There was no evidence of risk factors or how to minimise them being considered when deciding whether to suspend an employee under the company policy.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Institute of the Motor Industry; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to refer employees to or remind them of available support services
Wider context from the report “• There were no notes available for the meeting on 13th March or evidence of consideration/discussion of risk at that meeting. There was no evidence that he had been referred to or reminded of the support services available to him.
” Open source report