Recipient

Ison Harrison Limited

First report 27 Oct 2016•Latest report 27 Oct 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ison Harrison Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Yorkshire (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel Thomas Lindor Carroll · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel Thomas Lindor Carroll contacted emergency services stating that he felt suicidal and wanted to jump off a bridge, and was taken to hospital for a mental health assessment before being discharged. He was later found hanging from a tree and died from asphyxia due to hanging by ligature. The report raised concerns that police and ambulance staff did not ask whether he consented to family or friends being informed, meaning no family or friends were alerted to his hospital attendance or discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ison Harrison Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ambulance services to ask for consent before sharing information about suicidal feelings or hospital attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Police Officers did not ask Mr Carroll whether he wished, or consented to, anyone being told of the fact he was feeling suicidal or that he was being taken to the Hospital. 2. The Ambulance service did not ask Mr Carroll if he wished, or consented to, anyone being told of the fact he was feeling suicidal and being taken to Hospital. 3. As a consequence no family or friends were alerted to Mr Carroll being taken to or discharged from Hospital following an earlier expression of suicidal ideation. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ison Harrison Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of police officers to ask for consent before sharing information about suicidal feelings or hospital attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Police Officers did not ask Mr Carroll whether he wished, or consented to, anyone being told of the fact he was feeling suicidal or that he was being taken to the Hospital. 2. The Ambulance service did not ask Mr Carroll if he wished, or consented to, anyone being told of the fact he was feeling suicidal and being taken to Hospital. 3. As a consequence no family or friends were alerted to Mr Carroll being taken to or discharged from Hospital following an earlier expression of suicidal ideation. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026