Recipient

Jaguar Land Rover

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Aug 2024•Latest report 27 Aug 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Jaguar Land Rover linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Alfie Tollett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alfie Tollett, aged seven, died after being trapped between a white VW van and his father’s Kia when a Jaguar I-Pace moved forward in a rugby club car park. The inquest concluded that the death was accidental and recorded blunt force traumatic chest injuries. A principal concern was that the vehicle had no intermediary step between selecting drive or reverse, which may have made it difficult to detect that the incorrect button had been pressed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Jaguar Land Rover; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the reversing warning sound to be sufficiently audible inside the car

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There were a number of errors that were made by the driver which caused or contributed to the death . These were • Wrongly placing the car in drive instead of reverse • Failing to look down at the camera and pressing the button to move forward by touch alone • Failing to realise that the reversing warning sound which was said to be very difficult to hear inside the car was not engaged • Driving forward and continuing to do so for 8-10 seconds after the accelerator was pressed • Failing to press the brake at any time . (3 ) However , these errors occurred as a result of there being no intermediary step within the Jaguar ipace being necessary to put the car into drive / reverse other than pressing a button . In the police officer’s opinion if there had also been a lever or something similar present in the vehicle that needed to be engaged before a button was pressed this may have alerted ████████ to the fact that he had pushed the incorrect button on the 3 button console . ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Jaguar Land Rover; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an intermediary control step for selecting drive or reverse

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There were a number of errors that were made by the driver which caused or contributed to the death . These were • Wrongly placing the car in drive instead of reverse • Failing to look down at the camera and pressing the button to move forward by touch alone • Failing to realise that the reversing warning sound which was said to be very difficult to hear inside the car was not engaged • Driving forward and continuing to do so for 8-10 seconds after the accelerator was pressed • Failing to press the brake at any time . (3 ) However , these errors occurred as a result of there being no intermediary step within the Jaguar ipace being necessary to put the car into drive / reverse other than pressing a button . In the police officer’s opinion if there had also been a lever or something similar present in the vehicle that needed to be engaged before a button was pressed this may have alerted ████████ to the fact that he had pushed the incorrect button on the 3 button console . ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026