Recipient

Jockey Road Medical Centre

Pin Request correction

First report 17 Dec 2015•Latest report 17 Dec 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Jockey Road Medical Centre linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Edna May CLEATON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edna May CLEATON died at home after serious pressure sores became septic. The report raised concern that she had not seen a doctor for over three years while receiving repeat citalopram prescriptions, and that systems were needed to ensure appropriate medical reviews before repeat prescriptions were issued.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Jockey Road Medical Centre; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure appropriate medical reviews of patients on citalopram before repeat prescriptions are issued

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence heard at the inquest was that patients on citalopram should be reviewed by a doctor every 3 – 6 months. This lady had not been reviewed for over 3 years. The practice need systems in place to ensure patients received appropriate medical reviews before repeat prescriptions are issued. Had regular reviews been undertaken it is possible that medical staff would have identified deterioration in the deceased and a care plan could have been instigated which may have avoided the pressure sores that developed. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026