Recipient

Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Nov 2021•Latest report 22 Nov 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Other public body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    BERENICE NADIKA BELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Berenice had booked into an Airbnb and was found dead there on 20 May 2021 after failing to check out, having left a note. Evidence indicated that she had sought psychotherapy in April 2021 and had been feeling anxious and depressed; she had also lost her life savings after being scammed. Concerns included the role of ████████ in deaths among people under 35 and evidence that Berenice had accessed various ████████ family and mental health professionals, alongside reports of similar post-death findings by other families.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The single largest cause of death among people under 35 in the UK

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) ████████ is the single largest cause of death in the UK for people under 35. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Access to various family and mental health professionals

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Evidence was provided by the family that Berenice had accessed various ████████ family and mental health professionals. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Access to services before death among children who subsequently died from the same cause

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The family have discovered through a support group that other parents who have lost their children to ████████ have also discovered, after the deaths of their children, that their own children were also accessing ████████ before they died. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026