Concerns raised24
Failure to inform MAPPA panels about regularity and form of overt offender-management contact
Insufficient consideration of extremist offenders’ dishonest self-presentation
Failure to share and consider counter-terrorism police intelligence in MAPPA management
Failure to properly reason and record offender-manager licence-condition approvals
Failure to provide MAPPA panels important prison-history information
Failure to provide MAPPA panels direct input from the preparing forensic psychologist
Failure to communicate between offender managers and event organisers before extremist offenders attend events
Insufficient risk assessment and management for prison higher education programmes involving post-release offender contact
Sudden disruption of DDP mentoring arrangements
Sudden loss of supervised internet access for employment searches
Failure to complete the full structured assessment before changing an OASys risk rating
Failure to properly consider security-sensitive information in MAPPA decisions
Lack of precautionary search capability for terrorist offenders on licence
Failure to detect Class A drug use by terrorist offenders on licence
Unavailability of offender risk-profile information to prison-based higher education providers
Failure to ensure all MAPPA meeting attendees receive meeting minutes
Failure to ensure direct forensic psychologist involvement in ERG 22+ assessment reports
Failure to assess risks of continuing close contact between serious offenders and young students
Excessive reliance on compliance in management of extremist offenders
Failure to communicate high-risk event attendance to host venues
Failure to directly address risks when approving licence-condition changes
Lack of formal risk assessment for higher education events held outside university premises
Failure of MAPPA panels to conduct clearly reasoned discussion and decision-making on licence-condition changes
Failure to record proper rationale for changes to OASys risk ratings
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.