Recipient

Lifeshield Medical Service Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 19 Oct 2017•Latest report 19 Oct 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Lifeshield Medical Service Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    JAKUB DAWID MOCZYK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    JAKUB DAWID MOCZYK was taking part in a boxing match when he received a blow to the head, became unresponsive and died from his injuries on 21 November 2016. Concerns included incomplete pre-fight medical checks, medics not notifying the referee or promoter, and medics not assessing the opponent after he gagged or vomited before continuing the fight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lifeshield Medical Service Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that all boxers receive complete medical examinations before fighting

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Not all boxers were fully checked prior to the fight taking place, including the deceased’s opponent (aged 17 years). The medics did not notice he had not been fully examined. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lifeshield Medical Service Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify the referee and promoter of incomplete boxer medical examinations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The medics did not make the referee/promoter aware that not all the boxers had returned to complete their medical examination before the boxing had started. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lifeshield Medical Service Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to medically examine boxers and advise on fitness to continue fighting after gagging or vomiting

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) During the 2nd round the deceased’s opponent gagged/vomited on 2 occasions. The referee stopped the fight and counted to 8 on both occasions. The medics did not examine the boxer and advise as to his fitness to continue fighting, but relied on the referee to make the decision as to whether the fight should continue. It was known by the medics that the referee was not medically qualified. The medics were aware the referee was also the opponent’s own trainer. It was said in response to questioning in this respect, that the referee could be expected to know the boxer and whether he was fit to continue fighting. No account was taken that the referee/trainer may prefer the boxer to continue fighting rather than to stop the fight. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lifeshield Medical Service Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to retain independent medical decision-making on whether a boxer is fit to continue fighting

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) During the 2nd round the deceased’s opponent gagged/vomited on 2 occasions. The referee stopped the fight and counted to 8 on both occasions. The medics did not examine the boxer and advise as to his fitness to continue fighting, but relied on the referee to make the decision as to whether the fight should continue. It was known by the medics that the referee was not medically qualified. The medics were aware the referee was also the opponent’s own trainer. It was said in response to questioning in this respect, that the referee could be expected to know the boxer and whether he was fit to continue fighting. No account was taken that the referee/trainer may prefer the boxer to continue fighting rather than to stop the fight. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply a no-medical, failed-medical, or failed-drug-test rule prohibiting participation in boxing events.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The rules”

    Source location

    2017-0300-Response-by-Lifeshield-Medical-Services-Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain separate medical paperwork for participants, even when organisers provide their own records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also carry our own paperwork for medicals even if they supply their own.”

    Source location

    2017-0300-Response-by-Lifeshield-Medical-Services-Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Referees and corner men are responsible for making decisions or seeking medical advice at boxing events.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Referees will have first aid training. It is up to the referee and the corner men to make decisions or ask for advice. This was not ask for. It is up to the referee in all boxing events including British Boxing Association.”

    Source location

    2017-0300-Response-by-Lifeshield-Medical-Services-Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026