Recipient

Liverpool City Region Combined Authority

Pin Request correction

First report 28 Feb 2017•Latest report 28 Feb 2017

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Combined authority. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Liverpool City Region Combined Authority linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Michael BRIGGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 3 July 2015, Paul Michael Briggs was riding his motorcycle to work when an oncoming Nissan Micra crossed onto his side of the road and collided with him. He suffered multiple fractures and a traumatic brain injury, remained in a minimally conscious state, and died on 21 January 2017 after artificial nutrition and hydration was withdrawn. The report raised concern that adding rumble strips to the double white lines might reduce the risk of vehicles straying into the oncoming lane, and noted that risk assessments and remedial action were still outstanding some 20 months after the incident.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Liverpool City Region Combined Authority; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of rumble strips alongside double white lines separating opposing traffic in the tunnel approach

    Wider context from the report

    “Though there is appropriate signage, a two way sign as the carriageways merge and though there are double white lines dividing the tunnel bound carriageway from the Liverpool bound carriageway; this incident occurred resulting in a tragic death. It is unclear as to why the Nissan Micra strayed onto the wrong side of the road but had the double white lines also included rumble strips – (as in the tunnel itself and similar to the lines next to motorway hard shoulders)- this would minimise the risk of inadvertently straying into the oncoming lane especially at quiet times when the side barriers and the bend inhibit visibility of oncoming traffic. It is now some 20 months after this tragic incident which proved fatal and risk assessments as to the risk of this eventuality, with appropriate remedial action should be nearing completion. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Liverpool City Region Combined Authority; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in completing risk assessments and appropriate remedial action for wrong-side-road risks

    Wider context from the report

    “Though there is appropriate signage, a two way sign as the carriageways merge and though there are double white lines dividing the tunnel bound carriageway from the Liverpool bound carriageway; this incident occurred resulting in a tragic death. It is unclear as to why the Nissan Micra strayed onto the wrong side of the road but had the double white lines also included rumble strips – (as in the tunnel itself and similar to the lines next to motorway hard shoulders)- this would minimise the risk of inadvertently straying into the oncoming lane especially at quiet times when the side barriers and the bend inhibit visibility of oncoming traffic. It is now some 20 months after this tragic incident which proved fatal and risk assessments as to the risk of this eventuality, with appropriate remedial action should be nearing completion. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026