Recipient

LNT Software

First report 30 Aug 2013•Latest report 30 Aug 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from LNT Software linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs May Gibson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs May Gibson sustained fatal injuries in a significant fall in her room at Herries Lodge Care Home on 21 March 2013. The report identified failures in assessment, care planning, falls risk management, preventative measures, and staff training and supervision; the inquest found that her death was contributed to by neglect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staff training

    Wider context from the report

    “9) the evidence as a whole gave a picture of an establishment that had no cohesive management at the time, with staff who were caring but insufficiently trained and supervised. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to develop risk reduction plans when mandated by risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “5) the failure to develop a risk reduction plan when mandated by the risk assessment, even as it was actually completed; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and reconcile pre-admission and admission assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “2) the failure to make a proper pre-assessment, or query the differences in assessment with the City Council, or to make a further assessment upon admission; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to develop and review care plans that adequately recognise residents’ needs

    Wider context from the report

    “3) the failure to develop a care plan which recognised Mrs Gibson’s needs adequately, whether initially or by review after she had fallen on several occasions within the Home; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staff supervision

    Wider context from the report

    “9) the evidence as a whole gave a picture of an establishment that had no cohesive management at the time, with staff who were caring but insufficiently trained and supervised. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain community care assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “1) the failure to obtain the community care assessment and to take proper account of this in developing a care plan; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Possible failure to act on accident reports through risk or repeat-incident prevention strategies

    Wider context from the report

    “8) whilst not explored at the inquest, it may be that no managerial action was taken on the accident report forms to ensure that they were properly followed up with risk or repeat incident prevention strategies identified; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Confusion among staff about whether to call an ambulance or the out-of-hours GP service

    Wider context from the report

    “7) although not causative of Mrs Gibson’s death, there was confusion amongst staff as to the circumstances in which an ambulance should be called as opposed to contacting the out of hours GP service; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement available preventative measures based on known or reasonably available information

    Wider context from the report

    “6) the failure to take available preventative measures given the information that was known or should have been known; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct adequate risk assessments using all known and reasonably available information

    Wider context from the report

    “4) the failure to risk assess adequately, taking account of all information that was known, let alone information that should have been known; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to LNT Software; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of cohesive management

    Wider context from the report

    “9) the evidence as a whole gave a picture of an establishment that had no cohesive management at the time, with staff who were caring but insufficiently trained and supervised. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026