Recipient

Longshoot Medical Practice

First report 21 Jan 2014•Latest report 21 Jan 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Longshoot Medical Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Kyle Ashley Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kyle Ashley Smith was found unresponsive by his wife on 19 October 2013 and was pronounced dead by ambulance staff. A post-mortem found that his death was due to the combined toxic effects of Tramadol, Codeine and Zopiclone; concerns included a delay in an urgent mental-health referral reaching the assessment team, the reason for which had not been investigated and was not known.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Longshoot Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in urgent referrals reaching the Mental Health Assessment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Smith’s GP was concerned about his mental health when she saw him on the 15th of October 2013, to the degree that she decided to refer him urgently to the Mental Health Assessment Team. (2) That referral did not reach the Team until the 18th of October. (3) The reason for this delay has not been investigated and is not currently known. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Longshoot Medical Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to investigate reasons for referral delays

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Smith’s GP was concerned about his mental health when she saw him on the 15th of October 2013, to the degree that she decided to refer him urgently to the Mental Health Assessment Team. (2) That referral did not reach the Team until the 18th of October. (3) The reason for this delay has not been investigated and is not currently known. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026