Recipient

Marble Ideas Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Jan 2021•Latest report 29 Jan 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Marble Ideas Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Allan David GUNNELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Allan David Gunnell died on 24 August 2020 from progression of severe pulmonary fibrosis due to silicosis, following workplace exposure to silica dust. Concerns were raised about the absence of evidence regarding occupational health checks, compliance with HSE guidance and COSHH Regulations, employee risk information, and required health surveillance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Marble Ideas Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to advise employees of the risks of respirable crystalline silica exposure

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was requested but not received in relation to the occupational health checks that are carried out by your company, given the hazardous substances and high risk working practises that your employees are exposed to. The Health and Safety executive have published G404 which deals with the requirements placed upon employers who work with respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and there was no evidence before the court that you are working in compliance with this document, and advising your employees of the risks and carrying out the health surveillance required. This therefore potentially puts them at greater risk of developing the disease and not receiving timely health care. I therefore require you to consider the current arrangements in place to protect your employees an whether these are sufficient and in accordance with HSE guidelines and COSHH Regulations 2002. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Marble Ideas Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of demonstrable occupational health checks and required health surveillance

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was requested but not received in relation to the occupational health checks that are carried out by your company, given the hazardous substances and high risk working practises that your employees are exposed to. The Health and Safety executive have published G404 which deals with the requirements placed upon employers who work with respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and there was no evidence before the court that you are working in compliance with this document, and advising your employees of the risks and carrying out the health surveillance required. This therefore potentially puts them at greater risk of developing the disease and not receiving timely health care. I therefore require you to consider the current arrangements in place to protect your employees an whether these are sufficient and in accordance with HSE guidelines and COSHH Regulations 2002. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing health and safety procedures, external audits and unchanged working practices are considered sufficient to protect employees from respirable crystalline silica risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We reviewed our Company Health & Safety Policies in December 2016 using various external monitoring Companies. We implemented a higher level of Health & Safety Procedures and we have followed these upgraded procedures since. An External Yearly Audit is completed by our Safety Consultants, Direct Safety Solutions Ltd and the working practices and environment has not changed, so we are able to keep this high level of safety.”

    Source location

    2021-0026-Response-from-Marble-Ideas-Ltd-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Compliance with requirements for employers working with respirable crystalline silica is disputed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We dispute the evidence in your report that states Marble Ideas Limited are not working in Compliance with requirements placed on employers who work with RCS.”

    Source location

    2021-0026-Response-from-Marble-Ideas-Ltd-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 February 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026