Recipient

Medical Research Council

First report 8 Oct 2024•Latest report 8 Oct 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Sub-organisation. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
5stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Medical Research Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Maeve Boothby O’Neill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maeve Boothby O’Neill, who had severe ME and was bedbound, died at home on 3 October 2021 after three hospital admissions during 2021. The report identified concerns about the lack of specialist care provision for severe ME, limited research funding and medical training, and insufficient guidance on managing severe ME in the home or community, including nutritional support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Medical Research Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extremely limited doctor training on ME/CFS treatment, especially severe ME

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) During the course of the inquest it became clear that there was extremely limited training for Doctors on ME/ CFS and how to treat it – especially in relation to severe ME. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Medical Research Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of specialist healthcare provision for patients with severe ME

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the course of the evidence it became clear that there were no specialist hospitals or hospices, beds, wards or other health care provision in England for patients with severe Myalgic encephalopathies (ME). This meant that the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital had no commissioned service to treat Maeve and patients like her. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Medical Research Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of NICE guidance to provide detailed guidance on managing severe ME at home or in the community

    Wider context from the report

    “(4 ) During the course of the inquest it became clear that the 2021 NICE guidelines on ME did not provide any detailed guidance at all on how severe ME should be managed at home or in the community and in particular whether or not there is any necessary adaptation needed to the 2017 guidance on Nutrition support for adults : oral nutrition support , enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition . ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Medical Research Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of current funding for ME/CFS treatment research and understanding of causes

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) During the course of the inquest it became clear that there was no current available funding for the research and development of treatment and further learning for understanding the causes of ME / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain an open highlight notice to encourage ME/CFS research proposals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) recognises the unmet clinical need for better diagnosis and treatments for people living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and has prioritised research into ME/CFS for a number of years. Since 2019, the Medical Research Council (MRC), part of UKRI, has invested £3.6m in research in partnership with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) addressing ME/CFS and maintains an open highlight notice to encourage ME/CFS research. MRC continues to engage with researchers, patient representatives and charity funders to identify routes to catalyse biomedical research in this area.”

    Source location

    Response from MRC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Co-fund the DecodeME programme investigating genetic factors underlying ME/CFS and informing diagnostic and treatment research.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The DecodeME study, a major investment co-funded with the NIHR, is a £3.2m programme investigating the genetic underpinning of ME/CFS. The study will analyse samples from 25,000 people with ME/CFS to search for genetic differences that may indicate underlying causes or an increased risk of developing the condition. This study aims to increase our understanding of the disease and therefore contribute to the research base on diagnostic tests and targeted treatments for ME/CFS. In 2020, the NIHR, the Chief Scientific Office (CSO) in Scotland, and the MRC also funded the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for ME/CFS, facilitated by the charity Action for ME, seeking to identify and publicise research priorities in this area.”

    Source location

    Response from MRC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invest in ME/CFS research addressing unmet needs through MRC funding in partnership with NIHR.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) recognises the unmet clinical need for better diagnosis and treatments for people living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and has prioritised research into ME/CFS for a number of years. Since 2019, the Medical Research Council (MRC), part of UKRI, has invested £3.6m in research in partnership with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) addressing ME/CFS and maintains an open highlight notice to encourage ME/CFS research. MRC continues to engage with researchers, patient representatives and charity funders to identify routes to catalyse biomedical research in this area.”

    Source location

    Response from MRC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
60%40%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026