Recipient

MedPure Healthcare

Pin Request correction

First report 6 Oct 2021•Latest report 6 Oct 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from MedPure Healthcare linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Anthony JAGGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Jaggs was admitted to hospital on 15 January 2021 and developed hypoglycaemia as a complication of treatment for hyperkalaemia. The agency nurse did not escalate his deteriorating condition for medical attention, and he died from hypoglycaemia. The principal concern was that the agency had not provided additional training or required a reflective statement, raising concern that similar learning was not taking place within the agency.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MedPure Healthcare; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain reflective statements from agency staff after care incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “The agency nurse accepted in court that she should have sought prompt medical attention for Mr Jaggs and that she should have made a contemporaneous medical record of all his blood sugar readings. However, despite this sub optimal care, she said that she has not received any additional training from you following the incident. And she said that you did not ask her to draft a reflective statement, as the hospital trust had several times requested that you arrange. The trust has undertaken a great deal of work with its own staff to reduce the likelihood of such a failure in the future. I am extremely concerned that no similar learning is taking place within your agency. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MedPure Healthcare; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of additional post-incident training for agency staff

    Wider context from the report

    “The agency nurse accepted in court that she should have sought prompt medical attention for Mr Jaggs and that she should have made a contemporaneous medical record of all his blood sugar readings. However, despite this sub optimal care, she said that she has not received any additional training from you following the incident. And she said that you did not ask her to draft a reflective statement, as the hospital trust had several times requested that you arrange. The trust has undertaken a great deal of work with its own staff to reduce the likelihood of such a failure in the future. I am extremely concerned that no similar learning is taking place within your agency. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026