Recipient

Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council

First report 27 Sep 2022•Latest report 13 Jun 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Welsh county borough council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
5

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
8stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Valerie HILL died from pneumonia following a fall that caused a periprosthetic femur fracture, with COPD and frailty of old age contributing. She had remained on the floor for over 14 hours awaiting an ambulance after falling at Ty Bargoed Care Home. The report raised concerns about the identification, documentation and mitigation of falls risks, staff training, completion and oversight of risk assessments, and ambulance handover and patient-flow systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of falls-management materials to address preventive risk identification, assessment and documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) the material filed with me focuses upon how to move a fallen person/their management post fall, not the identification /assessment/documentation of risk in order to prevent/mitigate the happening of such events. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an available Falls Prevention Strategy or Policy for resident falls-risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Your Exhibit KL1 at page 27 references regard being had to Falls Prevention Strategy or Policy – I have received no evidence that MTCBC have such available and in place to inform Care Home’s and their staff in preparation for the completion of a resident’s falls risk assessment ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to analyse, assess and communicate falls notifications to inform ongoing risk assessment and mitigation

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) Whilst I am reassured to an extent in relation to the management and retention of incident & risk assessment documentation created in Ty Bargoed moving forwards, I am unclear as to what action, if any, MTCBC’s Health and Safety Unit take upon receipt of falls notifications (as described in ████████’s evidence) and what, if any, analysis/assessment/communication is undertaken in respect of the same with a view to supplementing the ongoing falls risk assessment and collateral mitigating measures. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain Registered Healthcare Professional countersignatures on falls-risk assessment forms

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The exhibits to your statement at KL 1 page 58 appear to suggest that the risk assessment forms ought to be completed/counter-signed by a Registered Healthcare Professional. I received no evidence that such a practice was/is in operation at Ty Bargoed ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of effective staff training in falls-risk identification, documentation and mitigation

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The material provided at, and post Inquest is absent in evidencing that staff at Ty Bargoed receive any specific, relevant, or effective training in respect of the identification & documenting of falls risks to residents, and the mitigation that can be put in place to reduce those risks. In particular, how the assessments ought to be approached and completed. The material filed, largely relates to employee safety in being able to move and handle residents appropriately. That, I understand is not the aim of the All-Wales NHS Patient Moving and Handling Assessment Documents I was taken to at the Inquest. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a post-fall summary process to review individual falls and identify ongoing risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. Additionally, a Post Fall Summary document has also been developed as a means of review and evaluation of any falls sustained by care home residents, to further understand and review risk in general on an ongoing basis. A copy of this document is attached to this witness statement marked “KL 8”.”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement staff guidance for preventing and managing falls in residential care homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Consequent upon the concerns of HM Senior Coroner, however, a number of new documents have now been drafted and have recently been implemented by Merthyr Council in the context of addressing these concerns, moving forwards.”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a new moving and handling risk assessment form for residential care occupants.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. As part of this process, a new Moving and Handling Risk Assessment Form has also been developed and a copy of that new form is attached to this witness statement as “KL 9”. It is anticipated that this new approach to the moving and handling plan will ensure that this document is a “living document” – that is to say – it is continually informed and reviewed by”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deliver additional training on the falls guidance, multifactorial assessment and post-fall summary documents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “13. There will be additional training as to the newly created Prevention and Management of Falls Guidance, the Multifactorial Falls Assessment document and the Post Fall Summary document. Once again, this is an ongoing process, but there is a meeting arranged on Friday 5th September with the Council’s Health and Safety officer and Manual Handling trainer to discuss the development of this training programme.”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a multifactorial falls risk assessment for relevant adult services users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. A copy of the latest version of this Prevention and Management of Falls guidance document for staff is attached to this witness statement marked “KL 6”.”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adult Social Care is responsible for general falls risk through individual care and moving-and-handling plans; Health and Safety addresses environmental or particular risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “24. The (ever present) falls risk associated with elderly persons in a care home setting is primarily the focus of Adult Social Care and needs to be addressed via individual care plans (through Social Services) and moving and handling plans (developed on site – see above), based on appropriate risk assessments. The health and safety team’s principal involvement should be to ensure that if there is an underlying environmental or other particular risk, it is picked up and addressed. Despite the best staff and care, there will be falls from time to time – this is a recognised feature of the care of older and frail persons.”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 6 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Registered healthcare professional sign-off is inappropriate in local-authority care homes because such professionals are not routinely available and the requirement is context-specific.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “17. Firstly, at paragraph (4) HM Senior Coroner identified that the risk assessment forms – according to the All Wales NHS Scheme documentation provided in my initial statement – required to be signed off by a Registered Healthcare Professional. It will be understood by HM Coroner that this documentation was developed, primarily, by the NHS in Wales for use in NHS settings, with regard to the moving and handling of NHS patients. The availability of Registered Healthcare Professionals in those settings is obvious. In a local authority residential care home environment, registered medical healthcare professionals of this type are never routinely available and the “requirement” for sign off of risk assessments by such persons is actually a vestige from the original environment in which these documents were developed (see above).”

    Source location

    Response from Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response
  2. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Aaron David Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aaron David Edwards, aged 42, died at the scene on 30 August 2020 after his motorcycle collided with a car at a junction in Merthyr Tydfil. The concerns identified were poor visibility at the junction, additional traffic and parked cars near a school during pick-up and drop-off times, and the risk of further deaths if driver speeds were not reduced.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive driver speeds on the Gurnos Ring Road

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The junction of Goitre Lane and the Gurnos Ring Road appears to be dangerous. Visibility is poor for the driver entering the Ring Road due to the bend in the road to the right and the railings protecting a subway below. (2) Traffic and parked cars around this area at the nearby school Pen-Y-Dre at pick-up and drop off times add to this danger. (3) Unless changes are made to slow down drivers on the Gurnos Ring Road more deaths may occur. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Traffic and parked cars around the junction during school pick-up and drop-off times

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The junction of Goitre Lane and the Gurnos Ring Road appears to be dangerous. Visibility is poor for the driver entering the Ring Road due to the bend in the road to the right and the railings protecting a subway below. (2) Traffic and parked cars around this area at the nearby school Pen-Y-Dre at pick-up and drop off times add to this danger. (3) Unless changes are made to slow down drivers on the Gurnos Ring Road more deaths may occur. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor visibility at the Goitre Lane and Gurnos Ring Road junction

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The junction of Goitre Lane and the Gurnos Ring Road appears to be dangerous. Visibility is poor for the driver entering the Ring Road due to the bend in the road to the right and the railings protecting a subway below. (2) Traffic and parked cars around this area at the nearby school Pen-Y-Dre at pick-up and drop off times add to this danger. (3) Unless changes are made to slow down drivers on the Gurnos Ring Road more deaths may occur. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
62%25%12%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026