Recipient

MJ Events Support Ltd

Pin Request correction

First report 20 Oct 2025•Latest report 20 Oct 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
14stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from MJ Events Support Ltd linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Marc Daniel DAVIES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marc Daniel Davies was found unconscious at the Huntsman Hotel on 16 October 2024 after staff were alerted that he was unwell. He was not revived and died at the hotel; the inquest recorded the medical cause of death as the combined toxic effects of methadone, clonazepam and nitrazepam. The report raises concerns about inadequate welfare checks, insufficient documentation, and a lack of evidence that staff had been trained to conduct or document welfare checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MJ Events Support Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff training on conducting and documenting welfare checks

    Wider context from the report

    “MCC contracted with MJ Events to provide safe guards; officers to ensure the security of the premises and the welfare of the residents. The officers were expected to undertake welfare checks if they had concerns about residents, including if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Managers from MCC and MJ Events who gave evidence to the inquest both agreed the welfare checks undertaken by the guards on duty on 16/10/2024, and documentation completed, were inadequate. There was no evidence that the staff had received training on how to conduct welfare checks or what should be documented. A failure to check on the welfare of staff and to reliably pass that information on to others could again result in a resident not receiving medical care in a timely manner. Kindly advise me as to the training that you intend to provide to staff to ensure that they are properly equipped with the skills to discharge their duties at work. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MJ Events Support Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to reliably pass welfare information to others

    Wider context from the report

    “MCC contracted with MJ Events to provide safe guards; officers to ensure the security of the premises and the welfare of the residents. The officers were expected to undertake welfare checks if they had concerns about residents, including if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Managers from MCC and MJ Events who gave evidence to the inquest both agreed the welfare checks undertaken by the guards on duty on 16/10/2024, and documentation completed, were inadequate. There was no evidence that the staff had received training on how to conduct welfare checks or what should be documented. A failure to check on the welfare of staff and to reliably pass that information on to others could again result in a resident not receiving medical care in a timely manner. Kindly advise me as to the training that you intend to provide to staff to ensure that they are properly equipped with the skills to discharge their duties at work. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MJ Events Support Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate documentation of welfare checks

    Wider context from the report

    “MCC contracted with MJ Events to provide safe guards; officers to ensure the security of the premises and the welfare of the residents. The officers were expected to undertake welfare checks if they had concerns about residents, including if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Managers from MCC and MJ Events who gave evidence to the inquest both agreed the welfare checks undertaken by the guards on duty on 16/10/2024, and documentation completed, were inadequate. There was no evidence that the staff had received training on how to conduct welfare checks or what should be documented. A failure to check on the welfare of staff and to reliably pass that information on to others could again result in a resident not receiving medical care in a timely manner. Kindly advise me as to the training that you intend to provide to staff to ensure that they are properly equipped with the skills to discharge their duties at work. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to MJ Events Support Ltd; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate welfare checks on residents

    Wider context from the report

    “MCC contracted with MJ Events to provide safe guards; officers to ensure the security of the premises and the welfare of the residents. The officers were expected to undertake welfare checks if they had concerns about residents, including if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Managers from MCC and MJ Events who gave evidence to the inquest both agreed the welfare checks undertaken by the guards on duty on 16/10/2024, and documentation completed, were inadequate. There was no evidence that the staff had received training on how to conduct welfare checks or what should be documented. A failure to check on the welfare of staff and to reliably pass that information on to others could again result in a resident not receiving medical care in a timely manner. Kindly advise me as to the training that you intend to provide to staff to ensure that they are properly equipped with the skills to discharge their duties at work. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
50%29%21%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026