Recipient

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

First report 13 Apr 2021•Latest report 13 Apr 2021

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · NHS trust. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
4stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Gary Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gary Day underwent an endoresection operation for choroidal melanoma at Moorfields Eye Hospital on 15 December 2020 and died the following day after becoming severely unwell from an air embolus. The concerns identified were that the risk of death from air embolism was not explained, no post-operative check for air embolus was carried out, and he was discharged without an overnight stay or access to his earlier medical notes when transferred to another hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma of the risk of air embolism and death

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to advise patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma to remain hospital inpatients for at least 24 hours

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of post-operative checks for air embolism

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cease undertaking further endoresection procedures of this nature.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern and if this procedure is performed at any time in the future we will ensure that patients are informed of the associated risk of death.”

    Source location

    2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust will not undertake further procedures because it cannot establish the cause of the air embolus.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern and if this procedure is performed at any time in the future we will ensure that patients are informed of the associated risk of death.”

    Source location

    2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust cannot provide enhanced postoperative monitoring and intensive care support because it lacks the necessary facilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The trust does not have the facilities to undertake the enhanced level of monitoring that patients undergoing this procedure would require. As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern”

    Source location

    2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 April 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
25%75%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026