Recipient

Moundsley Hall Nursing Home Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 6 Nov 2013•Latest report 6 Nov 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Moundsley Hall Nursing Home Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Henry MCQUOID · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Henry McQuoid, a resident at Moundsley Hall Home with dementia and swallowing difficulties, choked on food while eating lunch and died. The report raised concerns that there may have been insufficient staff to assist residents who needed help with feeding, with some staff reportedly feeling understaffed and too many agency staff being employed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Moundsley Hall Nursing Home Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing for resident feeding assistance

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Evidence given by the family suggested that there were an insufficient number of staff to provide assistance with eating for each resident who required it and that the family had been told by some members of staff that they themselves felt under staffed with too many agency staff being employed and thus a possibility that some residents who needed help in feeding might not receive it. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026