Recipient

National Coasteering Charter

First report 13 Oct 2023•Latest report 13 Oct 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Professional membership body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
5

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
10stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from National Coasteering Charter linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Iain Richard Farrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Iain Richard Farrell became breathless and exhausted during a led coasteering activity on 26 May 2019, was swept back into the sea by a large wave after reaching a ledge, and was later confirmed deceased despite resuscitation efforts. The principal concerns were the risks of lone guiding, the delayed access to the sole means of communication, and the absence of assessment of participants’ swimming ability and physical fitness during booking.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Coasteering Charter; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to address lone-guiding risks in coasteering guidance

    Wider context from the report

    “i. There are specific risks associated with “lone guiding” in coasteering, as detailed above. Highlighting these risks in NCC guidance will assist coasteering providers and guides in formulating effective and practical risk assessments to mitigate those risks; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Coasteering Charter; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess prospective participants’ swimming ability and physical fitness during coasteering booking

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. At the time of booking a coasteering experience, the nature and potential physical demands of the experience at the coasteering location proposed should be made clear and a prospective participant should be asked about their swimming ability and physical fitness. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Coasteering Charter; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure adequate guide staffing for coasteering groups

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. Given the risks associated with lone guiding, consideration should be given to the NCC guidance promoting that two guides should be the minimum allocated to any coasteering group. Where a provider departs from the guidance and allocates a single guide, they should be directed to ensure they can demonstrate additional safety measures they have adopted to mitigate the risks associated with lone guiding, including but not limited to how the safety needs of the participants are met if the guide becomes incapacitated, or if a participant becomes incapacitated requiring the full attention of the guide. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Coasteering Charter; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to disclose the nature and potential physical demands of the proposed coasteering experience at booking

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. At the time of booking a coasteering experience, the nature and potential physical demands of the experience at the coasteering location proposed should be made clear and a prospective participant should be asked about their swimming ability and physical fitness. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Coasteering Charter; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of an immediately accessible means of summoning emergency services for the lead guide

    Wider context from the report

    “iii. Consideration should be given to the NCC guidance making it clear that a lead guide should have with them, or within immediate reach, access to a means of communication with which to summon the emergency services, for example a mobile phone, or where there is known to be no mobile phone reception, a VHF radio. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce a final updated Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers document incorporating consultation responses and advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current NCC document, ‘Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers 2015 Version 3’ will be updated to address the 4 points raised as concerns by the Coroner in Section 5.2 i-iv in the Prevention of Future Deaths report. The rewrite will also update the 2015 version with other practices and advice that may have changed since the writing of the original advice with an aim of continuing to promote safe coasteering.”

    Source location

    Response from National Coasteering Charter
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add key learning points from the report to the NCC Guide Award through updates to Guide Award providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Item | How | When Provided NCC members with the information in the report | This will be shared with members at our AGM | 16th November 2023, (completed) Consultation with our membership regarding the Updates to the document ‘Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers’ | Via email and a working group led by the committee. | Consultation to start January 2024 Produce an updated final version of the document ‘Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers’ | Committee working group taking on responses and consultation advice from members | 1st March 2024 Provide updates to members ahead of the 2024 season on the changes made | Via regional representative meetings | March - April 2024 (Start of season) Add key learning points to our NCC Guide Award | Via updates to our Guide Award Providers | March - April 2024 (Start of season)”

    Source location

    Response from NCC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consult NCC members by email and through a committee-led working group on updates to the Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers document.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current NCC document, ‘Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers 2015 Version 3’ will be updated to address the 4 points raised as concerns by the Coroner in Section 5.2 i-iv in the Prevention of Future Deaths report. The rewrite will also update the 2015 version with other practices and advice that may have changed since the writing of the original advice with an aim of continuing to promote safe coasteering.”

    Source location

    Response from NCC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce a final updated Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers document incorporating member consultation responses and advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current NCC document, ‘Safety Advice for Coasteering Providers 2015 Version 3’ will be updated to address the 4 points raised as concerns by the Coroner in Section 5.2 i-iv in the Prevention of Future Deaths report. The rewrite will also update the 2015 version with other practices and advice that may have changed since the writing of the original advice with an aim of continuing to promote safe coasteering.”

    Source location

    Response from NCC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 November 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
20%80%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026