Recipient

Network Rail North West Route

Pin Request correction

First report 5 Feb 2026•Latest report 5 Feb 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Sub-organisation. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Network Rail North West Route linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Sefton, St Helens and Knowsley

    AI-generated summary

    Sam Alexander Dudley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sam Alexander Dudley, aged 29, died after being struck by a train at Hoggs Hill Level Crossing on 24 August 2025 while wearing headphones and entering the crossing when a red light was displayed and a klaxon was sounding. The principal concern was limited signage on the gate before the decision point, particularly as increasing numbers of people wear earphones; clearer pictorial signage warning against earphone use was suggested as potentially helpful.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Network Rail North West Route; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited warning signage at the walkway gate before the decision point

    Wider context from the report

    “Nationally there is signage once individuals pass through the gate, but there is limited signage on the gate itself as people enter the walkway, only a short distance from the “decision point.” Increasingly, more people wear earphones and are therefore less aware of their surroundings. Introducing clear pictorial signage on the gate, before individuals enter the ‘decision point’ area, such as an image of earphones with a line through them, may help alert users at the right moment. Visual cues generally attract initial attention more effectively and support rapid comprehension, while sound cues tend to create a stronger emotional connection. However, using both visual and auditory cues may together provide a more effective form of communication. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026