Recipient

NHS Scotland

Pin Request correction

First report 7 Mar 2016•Latest report 19 Dec 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Health-system partnership. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from NHS Scotland linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Mollie Rose Stansfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mollie Rose Stansfield, aged 22, died on 10 July 2019 after falling at Princes Quay, Hull, following her discharge from a place of safety under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983. The report identified failures at Hull Royal Infirmary to understand and correctly implement section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983, with the relevant paperwork being invalid while Mollie was apparently subject to that section and subsequently absconded.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to NHS Scotland; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to understand the implementation, significance and effect of Section 5(2) doctors holding power

    Wider context from the report

    “There was a failure at Hull Royal Infirmary to understand the process of implementing Section 5(2) of the Mental Health act 1983 [MHA] (Doctors Holding Power) as well as general uncertainty about its significance and effect. Mollie absconded from the ward whilst apparently under this section. The paperwork for the implementation of this section of the MHA 1983 was in fact not properly completed and hence invalid. Whilst the Hull & East Yorkshire NHS Trust has taken steps to educate doctors about this power, these were only local measures and I believe that all doctors working in England and Wales should be aware of section 5(2) and nurses of their equivalent power pursuant to section 5(4) of the MHA 1983 and that appropriate awareness and training should be given. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to NHS Scotland; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly complete Section 5(2) Mental Health Act paperwork

    Wider context from the report

    “There was a failure at Hull Royal Infirmary to understand the process of implementing Section 5(2) of the Mental Health act 1983 [MHA] (Doctors Holding Power) as well as general uncertainty about its significance and effect. Mollie absconded from the ward whilst apparently under this section. The paperwork for the implementation of this section of the MHA 1983 was in fact not properly completed and hence invalid. Whilst the Hull & East Yorkshire NHS Trust has taken steps to educate doctors about this power, these were only local measures and I believe that all doctors working in England and Wales should be aware of section 5(2) and nurses of their equivalent power pursuant to section 5(4) of the MHA 1983 and that appropriate awareness and training should be given. ”
    Open source report

  2. Swansea and Neath Port Talbot

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Margaret Thomas · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Margaret Thomas died at Morriston Hospital on 30 October 2013 after suffering an intracerebral haemorrhage, following an episode of unresponsiveness and left-sided weakness. The report identified a potential interaction between Miconazole Gel and Warfarin, a lack of awareness of this interaction among health professionals, and possible difficulties locating clear interaction-checking resources.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to NHS Scotland; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Potential for Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction causing increased blood clotting time and INR

    Wider context from the report

    “It became apparent in the course of the evidence that (1) There is a potential for Miconazole Gel to have an interaction with Warfarin such as to increase the blood clotting time and hence a higher INR reading than should be expected. This could lead to significant uncontrolled bleeding. (2) There is a significant lack of knowledge of the interaction among health professionals and/or (3) The resources available to check the interaction may not be entirely clear on this issue or readily straight forward to locate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to NHS Scotland; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of knowledge of the Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction among health professionals

    Wider context from the report

    “It became apparent in the course of the evidence that (1) There is a potential for Miconazole Gel to have an interaction with Warfarin such as to increase the blood clotting time and hence a higher INR reading than should be expected. This could lead to significant uncontrolled bleeding. (2) There is a significant lack of knowledge of the interaction among health professionals and/or (3) The resources available to check the interaction may not be entirely clear on this issue or readily straight forward to locate. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to NHS Scotland; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear or difficult-to-locate resources for checking the Miconazole Gel and Warfarin interaction

    Wider context from the report

    “It became apparent in the course of the evidence that (1) There is a potential for Miconazole Gel to have an interaction with Warfarin such as to increase the blood clotting time and hence a higher INR reading than should be expected. This could lead to significant uncontrolled bleeding. (2) There is a significant lack of knowledge of the interaction among health professionals and/or (3) The resources available to check the interaction may not be entirely clear on this issue or readily straight forward to locate. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026