Recipient

North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust

First report 16 Dec 2014•Latest report 16 Dec 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · NHS trust. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
200%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

200%published responses found
8stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, now represented here by North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust.

    Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mikey James Hornby · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mikey James Hornby was born on 31 March 2014 and died after being found lifeless at home on the morning after he attended an out-of-hours service with strange breathing. The report records neonatal E. coli sepsis and meningitis, with the conclusion of natural causes contributed to by neglect. Concerns included failures to refer him to hospital when he had an infected umbilical cord or possible serious illness, and the lack of access to immediate blood testing and antibiotics.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to immediately admit children when meningitis is a realistic possibility

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to immediately refer children with infected umbilical cords to hospital at first OOH attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of facility for simple blood testing in the GP out-of-hours setting

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Cheshire and Mersey NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate seriously ill children to hospital during OOH assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the first attendance at the OOH service, the attending staff having seen the infected umbilical cord, did not immediately send Mikey to the Hospital (as would have been the correct procedure according to the Consultant Lead Paediatrician who gave evidence to me.) 2. On the second attendance the doctor failed to appreciate the seriousness of the situation and at 10.45 at night sent the child home with a prescription for analgesia (which could not be filled until the following day in any event). The Consultant Paediatrician gave evidence to me “that there was a very high probability that he would have survived” had he been sent to the hospital at this time as he could and would have been administered an intra-venous anti-biotic. 3. If there is any realistic possibility of the condition being meningitis, the child should have been immediately admitted to the hospital. 4. The GP covering the surgery that night indicated that they do not have the facility to take a simple blood test. If this is the case, then they should utilise the adjacent facilities at the Emergency Department of the hospital. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide training on managing severely ill children for out-of-hours GPs alongside mandatory and statutory training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Annual appraisals take place with all staff. Learning from incidents in service allows GPs to review their training needs so that alongside maintaining their annual Mandatory and Statutory Training, particular development needs can be met. For GPs in the Out of Hours Service, their Bridgewater-specific training will often run alongside the continuing professional development they undertake as part of their practice. In ████████ case, he has undertaken training on management of the severely ill child to support his general practice role.”

    Source location

    2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct quarterly clinical audits of practitioners’ records and provide supervision and competency action plans where practice falls short.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing checks on the quality of the services we provide are made via quarterly clinical audit reviews, where a sample of clinical and medical records from each practitioner are reviewed by the clinical director enabling best practice to be recognised and shared with colleagues. Where best practice is not followed a period of supervision and formal support with competency improvement action plans is implemented.”

    Source location

    2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement NICE feverish-illness guidance in the out-of-hours service using PEWS and assessment templates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2013, the Trust implemented national NICE guidance dated May 2013 entitled “Feverish illness in children: Assessment and initial management in children younger than 5 years” which is based on validated algorithms. A copy of a link to the NICE guidance is enclosed, for your ease of reference: http://www.nice.org.uk/cg160/chapter/recommendations.”

    Source location

    2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The service does not routinely perform paediatric blood tests; referral directly to hospital paediatricians is considered sufficient, rather than using the Emergency Department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In common with any GP practice, the GP Out of Hours service does not routinely take blood from children, including urgent circumstances, as we would not receive a report back in a timely enough manner to influence our decision making. If a practitioner felt that a blood test was likely to be important to the clinical decision making process, there is a clear referral protocol to the Paediatric department. A&E is not a referral route that we would use as there are pathways for an emergency referral to be made directly to the Paediatricians rather than patients waiting unnecessarily in A&E. At the time ████████, that a blood test was not deemed necessary, as evidenced through the NICE guidelines but if it had have been, an emergency referral to the Paediatricians would have been made.”

    Source location

    2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The clinical data produced a PEWS score of 0–2, which did not indicate that further action or hospital referral was required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is fully compliant with this guideline. The Trust uses the Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) system in the GP Out of Hours service as a way of ensuring that the steps recommended in the NICE guidance are considered (please see attachment one). Although the score sheet was not available during ████████ examination of Baby Mikey, running the score from the clinical data of the consultation showed the score is 0-2 which did not indicate further action was required.”

    Source location

    2014-0536-Response-by-Bridgewater-Community-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

200%
200%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
75%12%12%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026