Recipient

North Court Care HomeIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 17 Jun 2025•Latest report 17 Jun 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from North Court Care Home linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: Manager/Director of Operations, North Court Care Home, Maven Healthcare.

    Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Sonia Grace SORE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sonia Grace SORE, who had significant mobility difficulties and was assessed as at risk of falling from her bed, fell from her bed on 14 October 2023 and again on 20 October 2023. She later developed a subdural haematoma, deteriorated, and died on 8 November 2023. The substantive concern was that staff at North Court Care Home repeatedly failed to implement identified risk-mitigation measures, including securing the right-hand bed rail, suggesting a possible wider cultural problem.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Court Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement identified mitigation measures

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the evidence it was apparent that within North Court Care Home there was a less than diligent focus on risk assessment and mitigation. Despite risks being assessed, and mitigation measures identified, staff would regularly fail to implement the latter. In Mrs. SORE’s case this included the failure to secure the right hand side bed rail as identified in numerous risk assessments relating to mitigating her risk of falling from the bed. The evidence indicated that this applied in relation to the actions of multiple staff at the care home, not just a few, giving rise to the concern that this was a cultural problem at North Court Care Home ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Court Care Home; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of diligent risk assessment and mitigation

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the evidence it was apparent that within North Court Care Home there was a less than diligent focus on risk assessment and mitigation. Despite risks being assessed, and mitigation measures identified, staff would regularly fail to implement the latter. In Mrs. SORE’s case this included the failure to secure the right hand side bed rail as identified in numerous risk assessments relating to mitigating her risk of falling from the bed. The evidence indicated that this applied in relation to the actions of multiple staff at the care home, not just a few, giving rise to the concern that this was a cultural problem at North Court Care Home ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026