Recipient

North Tyneside General Hospital

First report 9 Oct 2015•Latest report 28 May 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from North Tyneside General Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Newcastle upon Tyne

    AI-generated summary

    Maia Hazel Ann Strachan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maia Hazel Ann Strachan was born on 6 July 2017 and died in hospital on 7 July 2017 after a complicated delivery involving shoulder dystocia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and severe macrosomia. The report identified concerns about inaccurate and suboptimal ultrasound assessment, inaccessible obstetric and diabetic records, missed opportunities for Caesarean delivery and joint decision-making, fetal scalp electrode use, documentation, and dissemination of expert findings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use Foetal Scalp Electrodes for critical fetal distress information

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Foetal Scalp Electrode: The use of Foetal Scalp Electrodes (FSE) provide critical information in respect of foetal distress and the time implications thereof. The Trust should draft and implement a clear and comprehensive Local Policy/Protocol for FSE use. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Suboptimal clinical documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Suboptimal Documentation: The Trust should implement a robust training and audit plan to address the risks of this occurring in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of patient-specific sequential scan data storage and sonographer alerts

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The ability to store sequential scan data specific to each patient and provide alerts to the Sonographer. This would facilitate comparison and prompt further investigation potentially altering a patient’s care plan and outcome. The Trust’s plan to procure software to facilitate the above should be urgently implemented. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide advice and explanations for informed pregnancy and delivery decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Joint Decision Making: - Provision of advice and explanation of the risks of pregnancy and the risks/benefits of vaginal delivery or by Caesarean Section are essential to ensure informed decision making. The Trust should draft and implement a clear and comprehensive Local Joint Decision Making Policy/Protocol. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to circulate independent expert findings and conclusions to relevant maternity staff

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) The Findings and Conclusions of ████████ (Independent Expert Witness): A redacted copy of ████████ report and conclusions should be circulated to all obstetrics and gynaecology staff (both nursing and medical) and all midwives. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of clinician access to obstetric and diabetic records

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A system of joint obstetric and diabetic care operates without the facility for clinicians to access patients’ obstetric and diabetic records whether manually or electronically. Accessibility is essential to inform clinical decisions and should be urgently addressed ”
    Open source report
  2. Newcastle upon Tyne

    AI-generated summary

    Patrick Joseph Carrick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patrick Joseph Carrick underwent laparoscopic high anterior resection for colorectal cancer on 23 January 2012 and subsequently deteriorated, later dying from a rare but recognised complication of the surgery. Concerns included a significant unexplained departure from his management plan during rapid deterioration, failure to action blood analysis results, inadequate monitoring, delays in administering antibiotics, and inadequate completion of nursing and medical notes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow or explain departures from a patient's management plan

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was a significant departure from a patients management plan without explanation (2) The above was compounded as it occurred in a period of rapid deterioration (3) Crucial blood analysis results were not actioned (4) Inadequate completion of nursing and medical notes ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to action crucial blood analysis results

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was a significant departure from a patients management plan without explanation (2) The above was compounded as it occurred in a period of rapid deterioration (3) Crucial blood analysis results were not actioned (4) Inadequate completion of nursing and medical notes ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North Tyneside General Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate completion of nursing and medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was a significant departure from a patients management plan without explanation (2) The above was compounded as it occurred in a period of rapid deterioration (3) Crucial blood analysis results were not actioned (4) Inadequate completion of nursing and medical notes ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026