Recipient

Petroc Group Practice

First report 12 Jun 2024•Latest report 12 Jun 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
4

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
5stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Petroc Group Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Louise Helen Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Louise Helen Jones was found deceased at home on 1 October 2023. The inquest recorded respiratory depression and opiate drug use, following an unintentional overdose involving morphine and bromazalam alongside other central nervous system depressant drugs. Concerns included the absence of an agreed opioid treatment and end-of-treatment plan, practice policies for long-term opioid prescribing and opioid–benzodiazepine co-prescribing, and warning flags after three months of morphine prescription.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Petroc Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP practice policy for co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) There was no policy in place at the GP practice regarding co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines, to reflect the MHRA/CHM advice referred to in NICE guidance regarding the increased risk of respiratory depression and death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Petroc Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of practice warning flags at the three-month stage of morphine prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There were no warning flags in place at the practice at the 3-month stage of morphine prescription, to reflect the MHRA/CHM advice referred to in NICE guidance, regarding the increased risk of addiction beyond this period. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Petroc Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP practice policy for long-term opioid prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was no policy in place at the GP practice regarding long term (longer than 3 months) prescription of opioids. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Petroc Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to agree an opioid treatment strategy and end-of-treatment plan before starting opioids

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was no agreement with Louise before starting opioids, regarding a treatment strategy and plan for end of treatment as recommended by NICE. There was no practice policy requiring such an agreement. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Petroc Group Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of practice policy requiring agreement of an opioid treatment strategy and end-of-treatment plan

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was no agreement with Louise before starting opioids, regarding a treatment strategy and plan for end of treatment as recommended by NICE. There was no practice policy requiring such an agreement. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise opioid prescribing as a significant event for practice-wide consideration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Significant Event Discussion: We have raised this as a significant event and will discuss it at our next practice-wide meeting, scheduled for the 19th of September. During this meeting, we will cover the new policy and how it pertains to our approach to new and ongoing prescriptions for opioids. Minutes and copies of the policy will be circulated afterwards and made available to all staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Petroc Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a comprehensive practice policy for opioid prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the points raised in the PFD report, we have developed a comprehensive practice policy for opioid prescribing. We believe this policy addresses points 1 to 4 in the report.”

    Source location

    Response from Petroc Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the opioid prescribing policy and its application at the scheduled practice-wide meeting, then circulate the minutes and policy to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Significant Event Discussion: We have raised this as a significant event and will discuss it at our next practice-wide meeting, scheduled for the 19th of September. During this meeting, we will cover the new policy and how it pertains to our approach to new and ongoing prescriptions for opioids. Minutes and copies of the policy will be circulated afterwards and made available to all staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Petroc Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 June 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
40%60%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026