Recipient

Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI)

Pin Request correction

First report 3 Mar 2014•Latest report 3 Mar 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI) linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North and West Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Andrew Morris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Andrew Morris died from a heart attack with an already compromised heart while diving at Wastwater on 27 January 2013. The report identified concerns that his medical certificate was not up to date for the technical diving courses and that no check was made to ensure compliance with the requirement for a certificate. It also identified a wider concern that compliance with PADI rules for technical diving courses was not effectively policed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inherent danger of Technical diving involving decompression stops and different gases

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Diving is both a method of work and a recreational sport. There is an inherent danger in diving, particularly when a dive requires decompression stops and the use of different gases. Because of the depth of the dives the risk of death or serious harm is significant. (2) The inherent danger in Technical diving is recognised by PADI in that there is a requirement for members undertaking Technical diving courses to have a medical certificate confirming their fitness to dive. (3) In Mr Morris’s case he must have been aware of the need for a medical certificate, but omitted or neglected to ensure that his certificates were up to date for each course. No check was made to ensure that he was compliant for the Tec 50 course. (4) Where recreational divers are undertaking Technical diving courses, particularly with Instructors who know them well, there is a danger that those requirements are overlooked, and there is no system for policing compliance. (5) As PADI have recognised the need to ensure that divers, before starting a course, are compliant with the PADI rules, there should be a method devised to police the adherence to those rules. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system to verify divers’ medical-certificate compliance before Technical diving courses

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Diving is both a method of work and a recreational sport. There is an inherent danger in diving, particularly when a dive requires decompression stops and the use of different gases. Because of the depth of the dives the risk of death or serious harm is significant. (2) The inherent danger in Technical diving is recognised by PADI in that there is a requirement for members undertaking Technical diving courses to have a medical certificate confirming their fitness to dive. (3) In Mr Morris’s case he must have been aware of the need for a medical certificate, but omitted or neglected to ensure that his certificates were up to date for each course. No check was made to ensure that he was compliant for the Tec 50 course. (4) Where recreational divers are undertaking Technical diving courses, particularly with Instructors who know them well, there is a danger that those requirements are overlooked, and there is no system for policing compliance. (5) As PADI have recognised the need to ensure that divers, before starting a course, are compliant with the PADI rules, there should be a method devised to police the adherence to those rules. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026