Recipient

Radiology Reporting Online LLP

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Feb 2014•Latest report 12 Feb 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Social-care provider. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Radiology Reporting Online LLP linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Georgina Violet SWINDELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Georgina Violet Swindells underwent a right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and subsequently developed persistent hypotension and haemorrhage, dying on 18 September 2013. Concerns included delayed and failed transfer of CT images, the absence of an effective backup process, apparently erroneous reporting of the scan, and insufficient investigation data and incident reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Radiology Reporting Online LLP; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to elucidate the cause of image transfer delays

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The cause of the image transfer delay has not been elucidated; I am concerned that a similar incident could recur as a consequence; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Radiology Reporting Online LLP; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clarify the cause of erroneous scan reports and steps to address them

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The cause of the apparently erroneous scan report and steps taken to address this issue were not sufficiently clarified on the available evidence. This raises concerns that mis-reporting could happen again. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Radiology Reporting Online LLP; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of available data required to investigate image transfer issues

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The lack of available data, required to investigate this issue, is also a cause for concern. This has not been addressed; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Radiology Reporting Online LLP; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement the image transfer backup system

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The backup system in place (i.e. an on-call radiologist who can attend the hospital) appears not to have been implemented on this occasion. Again, the cause for this is unclear and I have concerns that the systems in place are not sufficiently robust; ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Radiology Reporting Online LLP; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an image transfer backup process

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There is no image transfer back-up process in place which could obviate against failure of the primary system; ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026