Recipient

Recipient name withheld

First report 15 Oct 2013•Latest report 15 Oct 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Recipient name withheld linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Lucy KILVERT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lucy KILVERT was taken to hospital on 14 June 2013 after falling at home on 10 June and subsequently deteriorating; she had hit her head and was taking blood-thinning medication. The principal concern was that she did not initially receive a head CT scan, which was performed about eight hours after hospital presentation and revealed an intracranial bleed; the report also noted possible shortcomings in how the significance of blood-thinning medication was emphasised in the relevant guidelines.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE Guidelines insufficiently emphasising blood-thinning medication in elderly people who have a fall when determining the need for a head CT

    Wider context from the report

    “namely that Mrs Kilvert was not initially at the hospital given a CT scan of the head. It was not performed until about 8 hours after presentation at hospital and revealed an intracranial bleed. The medical cause of death was :- 1a) Intracranial bleed, II Chronic Kidney Failure Hypertension Heart Valve Replacement. As it turned out neurological intervention would not have been appropriate even if a brain bleed had been discovered immediately. I was told by the consultant in emergency medicine who gave evidence, that although the NICE Guidelines were considered, the clinical judgment of the senior house officer who saw her initially was that there was no reason to suspect a bleed, although the consultant said that his judgment may have been different. The consultant felt that the Guidelines possibly insufficiently emphasised the significance of blood thinning medication in elderly people who had a fall when considering whether a CT scan of the head was necessary, albeit that eventually the matter was a question of clinical judgment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in performing a CT scan of the head after hospital presentation

    Wider context from the report

    “namely that Mrs Kilvert was not initially at the hospital given a CT scan of the head. It was not performed until about 8 hours after presentation at hospital and revealed an intracranial bleed. The medical cause of death was :- 1a) Intracranial bleed, II Chronic Kidney Failure Hypertension Heart Valve Replacement. As it turned out neurological intervention would not have been appropriate even if a brain bleed had been discovered immediately. I was told by the consultant in emergency medicine who gave evidence, that although the NICE Guidelines were considered, the clinical judgment of the senior house officer who saw her initially was that there was no reason to suspect a bleed, although the consultant said that his judgment may have been different. The consultant felt that the Guidelines possibly insufficiently emphasised the significance of blood thinning medication in elderly people who had a fall when considering whether a CT scan of the head was necessary, albeit that eventually the matter was a question of clinical judgment. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026