Recipient name withheld

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Jan 2017•Latest report 27 Jan 2017

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Recipient name withheld linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hampshire (North East)

    AI-generated summary

    Derek Edward Hope THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek Edward Hope THOMAS was struck by a non-stopping train while using the foot crossing at Bentley station on his mobility scooter on 5 October 2016, sustaining catastrophic injuries. Concerns included that the crossing was unmanned and unprotected, that the only direct warning was the train driver's horn, and that visibility was obscured by a fence.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of protection at the crossing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The crossing is unmanned and unprotected ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obscured visibility at the crossing caused by a fence

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Visibility is obscured by a fence although remedial action has been taken to reduce the height of it thereby improving visibility ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staffing at the crossing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The crossing is unmanned and unprotected ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Recipient name withheld; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequacy of direct warning of approaching trains at the crossing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The only direct warning is the horn being sounded by the driver some 400 m from the crossing ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026