Recipient

Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited

First report 18 Sep 2020•Latest report 18 Sep 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports: 1
Published responses: 100%
Concerns addressed: 3
Stated actions: 4

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found

4stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

18 Sep2020
West Yorkshire Eastern
Concerns raised5
1. Failure to provide and verify appropriate PPE training before infectious-disease ward work
2. Failure to preserve records of appropriate PPE training
3. Lack of information about staff members’ medical conditions
1. Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ work locations
2. Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ health vulnerabilities
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response 1
1. Action
  Audit subcontractor compliance with required occupational health checks and PPE training.
  Stated completed
Respondent positions 4
1. Position
  Reed says it fulfilled contractual obligations and audited subcontractor health checks and PPE training for supplied workers.
  Existing arrangements considered sufficient
1. Position
  Reed cannot investigate underlying medical declarations or fully scrutinise subcontractor training content beyond issued clearance certificates.
  Unable to act
2. Position
  ID Medical, as employer and supplier, should receive the report and take additional measures to protect temporary workers supplied through its arrangements.
  Redirects responsibility
3. Position
  Occupational health assessment and training were ID Medical’s responsibility, while regulatory scrutiny belonged to the regulator and Crown Commercial Service.
  Redirects responsibility
AI-generated summary

Macloud Nyeruke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

Report summary

Macloud Nyeruke was admitted to hospital on 23 November 2019 with fever, cough and confusion, and died there on 22 February 2020. He had multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. The concerns included that his medical conditions were not disclosed to the Trust, uncertainty about appropriate PPE training, and risks associated with nursing agencies supplying support workers without knowledge of their health vulnerabilities or work location.

Read the report on judiciary.uk
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to provide and verify appropriate PPE training before infectious-disease ward work
Wider context from the report
“(2) There is scant evidence as to whether Mr Nyeruke underwent appropriate training in respect of PPE such as masks before being permitted to work on a ward involving infectious diseases. The difficulties involved (where a support worker supplied by a nursing agency is only in the hospital for a brief period) are acknowledged. Nonetheless, the risk of an adverse transmission of infection either to, or from, the staff member necessitates stringent standards being enforced, with appropriate records preserved. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to preserve records of appropriate PPE training
Wider context from the report
“(2) There is scant evidence as to whether Mr Nyeruke underwent appropriate training in respect of PPE such as masks before being permitted to work on a ward involving infectious diseases. The difficulties involved (where a support worker supplied by a nursing agency is only in the hospital for a brief period) are acknowledged. Nonetheless, the risk of an adverse transmission of infection either to, or from, the staff member necessitates stringent standards being enforced, with appropriate records preserved. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of information about staff members’ medical conditions
Wider context from the report
“(1) Mr Nyeruke’s medical conditions were not made known to the Trust. In consequence, he had worked on wards where patients had infections involving multi-resistant organisms. Given his compromised immune state, this situation involved risk to both patients and Mr Nyeruke himself. In the absence of information concerning a particular staff member’s medical condition there is an increased risk of transmission of infections either to or from the staff member. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ work locations
Wider context from the report
“(3) Nursing agencies which supply support workers to hospitals without knowledge of their particular health vulnerabilities, or where they will be working, give rise to a risk that they may be adversely affected or may give rise to adverse effects on patients or colleagues. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reed Specialist Recruitment Limited; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ health vulnerabilities
Wider context from the report
“(3) Nursing agencies which supply support workers to hospitals without knowledge of their particular health vulnerabilities, or where they will be working, give rise to a risk that they may be adversely affected or may give rise to adverse effects on patients or colleagues. ”
Open source report
Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation
Audit subcontractor compliance with required occupational health checks and PPE training.

Verbatim wording from the response
“At the point when Mr Nyeruke was first introduced to LTHT this was via ID Medical in November 2016, as prior to Reed's involvement with LTHT ID Medical had a contract direct with the Trust and not a sub-contractual arrangement via Reed. Reed then entered into a sub-contracting arrangement with ID Medical in January 2019 as part of Reed then managing the staff bank, for the supply of Mr Nyeruke. After having thoroughly investigated the matter, I can confirm that Reed has fully complied with its contractual obligations towards LTHT and received confirmation from ID Medical to confirm that Mr Nyeruke was suitably vetted and medically fit to commence the temporary assignment at LTHT. Moreover, Reed did also perform the necessary audits on ID Medical to confirm that the required health checks and training (in relation to PPE) for Mr Nyeruke were performed.”

Source location
2020-0177-Response-from-Reed-Specialist-Recruitment-Ltd-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 19 November 2020
Open published response
Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation
Reed says it fulfilled contractual obligations and audited subcontractor health checks and PPE training for supplied workers.

Verbatim wording from the response
“At the point when Mr Nyeruke was first introduced to LTHT this was via ID Medical in November 2016, as prior to Reed's involvement with LTHT ID Medical had a contract direct with the Trust and not a sub-contractual arrangement via Reed. Reed then entered into a sub-contracting arrangement with ID Medical in January 2019 as part of Reed then managing the staff bank, for the supply of Mr Nyeruke. After having thoroughly investigated the matter, I can confirm that Reed has fully complied with its contractual obligations towards LTHT and received confirmation from ID Medical to confirm that Mr Nyeruke was suitably vetted and medically fit to commence the temporary assignment at LTHT. Moreover, Reed did also perform the necessary audits on ID Medical to confirm that the required health checks and training (in relation to PPE) for Mr Nyeruke were performed.”

Source location
2020-0177-Response-from-Reed-Specialist-Recruitment-Ltd-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 19 November 2020
Open published response
Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation
Reed cannot investigate underlying medical declarations or fully scrutinise subcontractor training content beyond issued clearance certificates.

Verbatim wording from the response
“Both contractually and legislatively the responsibility on ID Medical was to carry out an occupational health assessment and training. I can confirm Reed have seen evidence of this dating back to 2012 which falls in line with when Mr Nyeruke first engaged with ID Medical. However, Reed are unable to investigate the detailed evidence beyond the health clearance such as the medical declarations made by Mr Nyeruke, and other supporting evidence that underpin the occupational health fitness to work certificate, nor can we fully scrutinise the training content that sits behind the certificates. This is a matter for the regulator and Crown Commercial Service, which is why we escalated this matter to them within 24/76 hours of receiving your initial report.”

Source location
2020-0177-Response-from-Reed-Specialist-Recruitment-Ltd-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 19 November 2020
Open published response
Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation
ID Medical, as employer and supplier, should receive the report and take additional measures to protect temporary workers supplied through its arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response
“My suggestion to re-address the Regulation 28 Report to ID Medical was made on the basis that Reed is unable to take any steps other that I have set out above in relation to individuals supplied by sub-contractors and that ID Medical as the employer/supplier, should be made aware of this Report in order to take additional measures (you deem fit) to protect the health and safety of temporary workers they engage.”

Source location
2020-0177-Response-from-Reed-Specialist-Recruitment-Ltd-Redacted.pdf
Page 2 · response
Published 19 November 2020
Open published response
Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation
Occupational health assessment and training were ID Medical’s responsibility, while regulatory scrutiny belonged to the regulator and Crown Commercial Service.

Verbatim wording from the response
“Both contractually and legislatively the responsibility on ID Medical was to carry out an occupational health assessment and training. I can confirm Reed have seen evidence of this dating back to 2012 which falls in line with when Mr Nyeruke first engaged with ID Medical. However, Reed are unable to investigate the detailed evidence beyond the health clearance such as the medical declarations made by Mr Nyeruke, and other supporting evidence that underpin the occupational health fitness to work certificate, nor can we fully scrutinise the training content that sits behind the certificates. This is a matter for the regulator and Crown Commercial Service, which is why we escalated this matter to them within 24/76 hours of receiving your initial report.”

Source location
2020-0177-Response-from-Reed-Specialist-Recruitment-Ltd-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 19 November 2020
Open published response

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Concerns raised5

Failure to provide and verify appropriate PPE training before infectious-disease ward work

Failure to preserve records of appropriate PPE training

Lack of information about staff members’ medical conditions

Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ work locations

Failure of nursing agencies to provide hospitals with support workers’ health vulnerabilities

Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1

Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

Actions described in response 1

Respondent positions 4