Recipient

Reigate & Banstead Borough Council

First report 6 Aug 2014•Latest report 6 Aug 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English district council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports: 1
Published responses: 0%
Concerns addressed: 0
Stated actions: 0

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found

0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Reigate & Banstead Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

6 Aug2014
Surrey
Concerns raised7
1. Lack of operative guidance or training on placing traffic lights near blind bends
2. Lack of a clear route for locating the person responsible for placing road works
3. Failure to pass public calls about serious road-network safety issues directly to those responsible for action
1. Failure to carry out effective risk assessments for road works
2. Insufficient visibility distance between approaching drivers and temporary traffic light heads
3. Inadequate staff training in the safe setting up of road works
4. Lack of a clear police policy or protocol for responding to public risks created by road works
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
AI-generated summary

Lee Michael FRIEND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

Report summary

Lee Michael Friend died on 21 February 2013 after his motorcycle collided with stationary traffic near temporary road works on a blind bend. The report raised concerns about the positioning and visibility of temporary traffic lights, the adequacy of risk assessments and training for road works, the response to public safety concerns, and Surrey Police’s procedures for identifying and reporting risks created by road works.

Read the report on judiciary.uk
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of operative guidance or training on placing traffic lights near blind bends
Wider context from the report
“1. Action is required to ensure that when temporary traffic lights are placed there is a minimum distance of visibility (line of sight) between approaching drivers and the temporary traffic light heads. Further, guidance or training should be provided to operatives as to placing traffic lights near to blind bends or where waiting traffic will encroach upon blind bends. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of a clear route for locating the person responsible for placing road works
Wider context from the report
“2. Action is required by Surrey Police to formulate a clear policy/protocol for all Officers to follow when they identify a risk created to the public by road works which should include a clear route allow them to locate who is responsible for the placing of the road works if not apologies board is seen/present. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to pass public calls about serious road-network safety issues directly to those responsible for action
Wider context from the report
“3. Action is required by Reigate and Banstead Council to ensure that any calls from members of the public to the Council about serious safety issues relating to the road network are passed directly to those with responsibility to take action. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Failure to carry out effective risk assessments for road works
Wider context from the report
“4. Action is required by Sutton and East Surrey Water to take steps to ensure all members of staff are fully and properly trained in the safe setting up of road works and the carrying out of effective risk assessments. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Insufficient visibility distance between approaching drivers and temporary traffic light heads
Wider context from the report
“1. Action is required to ensure that when temporary traffic lights are placed there is a minimum distance of visibility (line of sight) between approaching drivers and the temporary traffic light heads. Further, guidance or training should be provided to operatives as to placing traffic lights near to blind bends or where waiting traffic will encroach upon blind bends. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Inadequate staff training in the safe setting up of road works
Wider context from the report
“4. Action is required by Sutton and East Surrey Water to take steps to ensure all members of staff are fully and properly trained in the safe setting up of road works and the carrying out of effective risk assessments. ”
Open source report
Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Reigate & Banstead Borough Council; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation
Lack of a clear police policy or protocol for responding to public risks created by road works
Wider context from the report
“2. Action is required by Surrey Police to formulate a clear policy/protocol for all Officers to follow when they identify a risk created to the public by road works which should include a clear route allow them to locate who is responsible for the placing of the road works if not apologies board is seen/present. ”
Open source report

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Concerns raised7

Lack of operative guidance or training on placing traffic lights near blind bends

Lack of a clear route for locating the person responsible for placing road works

Failure to pass public calls about serious road-network safety issues directly to those responsible for action

Failure to carry out effective risk assessments for road works

Insufficient visibility distance between approaching drivers and temporary traffic light heads

Inadequate staff training in the safe setting up of road works

Lack of a clear police policy or protocol for responding to public risks created by road works