Recipient

Sai Skn Limited

First report 27 Mar 2026•Latest report 27 Mar 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
4stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Sai Skn Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Edith Millington · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith Millington, aged 90, fell while attempting to enter a convenience store using a mobility scooter and walking stick, striking her head. She died at Salford Royal Hospital on 09.09.25, with the medical cause of death recorded as traumatic intracranial haemorrhage. The concern was that the store’s ramp was unsafe because it was unsecured, its rubber mat was not fixed, accessible handrails were absent, and the ramp was too short and steep, creating a risk of a similar fatal fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sai Skn Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Access ramp that is too short and therefore too steep

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sai Skn Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to secure the rubber ramp mat against movement

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sai Skn Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of external, easily accessible handrails on the access ramp

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Sai Skn Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to fix or secure the access ramp to the ground

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, today, of your store supervisor ████████ was that the ramp remains exactly as it was on the day of EM’s fatal accident. It is my opinion that the structure/design of the ramp makes it unsafe. In particular that the ramp itself is not fixed or secured to the ground (not even semi-fixed so that it can be removed at the end of the day), that the rubber mat is not fixed and can easily move (as seen), there are no external easily accessible handrails, and the ramp is too short making the slope steeper. The issue of concern is that unless action is taken to render access to the store by way of a safer design of ramp then there is a high risk of a customer, particularly a customer with mobility issues, suffering a similar and fatal fall as EM. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install fixed grab rails on both sides of the entrance to improve customer support and stability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional fixed grab rails have been installed on both sides of the entrance to provide improved support and stability for customers entering and exiting the store.”

    Source location

    Response from Sai SKN Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove the metal access ramp and replace the former ramp arrangement with a small, stable entrance step.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following a full review of the incident and the issues identified, with further consultation and input from ████████ from Trafford Council we have taken immediate corrective action in respect of the entrance to our premises.”

    Source location

    Response from Sai SKN Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
75%25%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026